NCT Number: NCT03846622
Comparison of Scoring Systems for Bleeding in Open Cardiac Surgery Patients
Seven different scoring systems used for prediction of perioperative bleeding were compared regarding patients operated for elective open cardiac surgery in the investigator's study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Observational
About this study
Collected data of 500 consecutive patients, operated for elective open cardiac surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Seven different scoring systems were used to predict the probability of bleeding, including TRACK, PAPWORTH, WILL-BLEED, CRUSADE, ACTION, TRUST and ACTA-PORT. The scores are calculated for each of these systems by using their own parameters, and classified into four risk groups as very low, low, moderate and high. Then, these risk groups were compared with patients identified in two groups regarding the use of perioeprative erythrocyte suspension (ES) transfusions or not, as ES positive and ES negative.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients with 18 years of age or older,
- Patients operated for elective open cardiac surgery.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with incomplete data,
- Patients with an age less than 18 years,
- Patients operated for emergent surgical procedures.
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Bleeding scores
Time frame: Bleeding risk scores were calculated through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Bleeding scores were calculated in points ranging from 0 to 4.(0 the lowest and 4 the highest risk score for bleeding)
-
The amount of blood transfusions
Time frame: The amount of blood transfusions were recorded through study completion, an average of 2 years.
The amount of blood transfusions were recorded in units.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Kocaeli Derince Education and Research Hospital
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Comparison of Preoperative Scoring Systems for Prediction of Perioperative Bleeding in Patients To Be Operated for Open Cardiac Surgery
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2018
- Study completion
- 2018
- First posted
- Feb 19, 2019
- Registry last updated
- Feb 19, 2019
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
The Efficacy of Lavender Herbal Tea in Premenstrual Syndrome
NCT07737366
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Sakarya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsColibricare Efficacy on Oral Surgical Procedures/Extraction Wound and Gingiva Retraction
NCT07638930
Bleeding, Hemorrhage
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsStannous Fluoride Toothpaste for Reduction and Treatment of Gingivitis
NCT07640399
Bleeding, Gingival Diseases
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsThis Study Aims to Assess the Impact of 50°C Saline Irrigation on the Overall Intraoperative Blood Loss and Surgical Visualization During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Rhinosinusitis.
NCT07627789
Bleeding, Hemorrhage
Warsaw, Mazovian, Poland
View Trial Details