Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05510258

Comparison of Routine and Core-stability Exercises on Dynamic Sitting Balance and Trunk Control in Stroke Patients

This is ROM trail study. Data collected from Rabbani Hospital Lahore . in this study total two groups included control and experimental and sample size was 48 and 24 persons divided in each groups as well. Informed consent was taken from the recruited subjects. Two scales BBS and TIS used to measure the outcomes. Data analyse by ssps V21.0 with a significant level of p valued 0.05. Results were in the favour of experimental group.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

25 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Duaa Awais

Lahore, Punjab Province, 53700, Pakistan

About this study

This is ROM trail study. Data collected from Physiotherapy department of Rabbani Hospital Lahore . In this study total two groups included control and experimental and sample size was 48 and 24 persons randomly allocated in each groups as well. In control group conventional therapy given while in experimental group core-stability exercises with conventional therapy given to the patients. while the duration of therapy was 45 minutes per day for 8 weeks. Informed consent was taken from the recruited subjects. Two scales BBS and TIS used to measure the outcomes. Only having first episode of sub-acute stoke patients and diagnosed by Neuro-physician were included in study. Data entered and analysed by SSPS V21.0 with a significant level of p valued 0.05. and the results were in the favour of study means experimental group.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Sub-Acute ischemic and stroke diagnosed by neuro-physican having 1st episode
  • Patients in sub-acute stage (2-12 weeks)
  • Patients who can follow the instruction according to mini mental scale < 7
  • Minimum score of a patient on burg balance and trunk impairment scale to enter in rehab unit and include in any research i-e TIS < 2 in scoring and BBS < 4 minimum scoring.
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • Recurrent stroke
  • Subjects with radiating pain or nerve root involvement
  • Diagnosed by any neurological condition other than stroke, or other clinical comorbidity that affect the trunk balance.
  • Patient unable to follow the instructions
  • Comprehension deficits that prevented them from following verbal commands
  • Unconscious patient

Treatment and study plan

Physiotherapy

Other

TWO GROUPS CONTROL ND EXPERIMENTAL

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Berg balance scale at week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

    Berg balance scale(BBS) used clinical test of a person's static and dynamic balance abilities. BBS comprises a set of 14 items which includes unsupported sitting to unsupported standing and weight shifting while standing unsupported.

    • Lower score =1 (Sitting to standing)
    • Higher score=14 (weight shifting while standing)
  2. Change from baseline in Trunk impairment scale at week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

    The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) is a tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. TIS scores on a range from 0 to 23. Static sitting balance, Dynamic sitting balance and Co-ordination will be evaluated by this scale.

    • Static sitting balance=7
    • Dynamic sitting balance=10
    • Co-ordination=6

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Lahore

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Routine Physical Therapy With and Without Core-stability Exercises on Dynamic Sitting Balance and Trunk Control in Sub-acute Ischemic Stroke Patient

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2021
First posted
Aug 22, 2022
Registry last updated
Aug 22, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.