Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06552533

Comparison of Resistance Training With and Without Plyometric Exercises on Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Chronic ankle instability is characterized by a patient's being more than 12 months removed from the initial LAS and exhibiting a propensity for recurrent ankle sprains, frequent episodes or perceptions of the ankle giving way, and persistent symptoms such as pain, swelling, limited motion, weakness, and diminished self-reported function. This study will Compare Resistance Training with and without Plyometric exercises on Athletes with Chronic Ankle instability and changes will be recorded using different methods and tools. Patients will be randomly allocated into two different groups. Group A will be treated with resistance training and Group B will be treated with resistance training along with plyometric exercises . Participants will complete clinician-oriented tests. Participants of both groups will be evaluated before and after the application of respective interventions at the end of 8th week. Data will be analysed.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Sehat Medical Complex, Pakistan sports board complex

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Anam Dalawar, DPT

CONTACT

[email protected]

03403546668

Syed Asad ullah Arslan, PHD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Resistance training applies effort to overcome resistance, which results in increased muscle fibre recruitment and stronger synchronization, ultimately enhancing neuromuscular control and leading to muscular growth. Elastic resistance training is not only the cheaper intervention but is also able to promote similar strength gains to conventional resistance training. Both isokinetic muscle strength training and Thera-Band strength training have been used extensively to increase muscle strength after sports injuries and improve muscle performance in athletes, thereby accelerating injury recovery. Plyometric training provided benefits in both static and dynamic balances for individuals with Functional ankle instability. Plyometric are more effective than resistive exercises in improving functional performance of athletes after lateral ankle sprain. Convenient sampling technique will be used to collect the data. The sample size of 24 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomly allocated into two different groups through sealed envelope method.12 patients will be allocated in each group A will be treated with resistance training and Group B will be treated with resistance training along with plyometric exercises so resistance training exercises are help full in athletic performance .Group B will be treated with resistance training along with plyometric exercises . Participants will complete patient-oriented questionnaires (CAIT for measuring the severity of functional ankle instability Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [FAAM] to assess physical function for individuals with foot and ankle related impairments, Numeric pain rating scale for pain, Short-Form 36 [SF-36] to indicate the health status of particular populations, to help with service planning and to measure the impact of clinical and social interventions. Culture-specific data are required to calculate SF-36 norm-based. Goniometer to measure available ranges will also be used Participants of both groups will be evaluated before the application of interventional techniques and re-evaluated after the application of respective interventions at the end of 8th week. Data will be analysed on SPSS 21 .The combination of both resistance and plyometric exercises could give more significant result.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A history of at least 1 substantial ankle sprain with associated inflammatory symptoms and at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity, multiple episodes of the ankle "giving way," recurrent sprain, and "feelings of instability" in the 6 months before the study. Patients scoring the FAAM, there should be two scores, less than the ADL subscale and the Sports subscale, 20/21 items and 7/8 items must be completed, respectively
  • If both ankles qualified, the ankle with the highest score (i.e. the most severely affected ankle) was considered the involved limb.

Exclusion criteria

  • Volunteers were excluded if they had sustained an acute lower extremity injury in the 3 months before the study
  • Having participated in formal rehabilitation in the 3 months before the study
  • Having a history of lower extremity surgery or fracture that required alignment in the involved limb
  • Having any diagnosed neurologic dysfunction, such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, or head injury.

Treatment and study plan

Resistance Exercises with Plyometric exercises

Other

We will apply protocol for 8 weeks 24 Sessions (3 sessions in a week) and 10 sec rest between each segment, 3 sets of 10 repetitions.

Resistive training will start in the form of manual resistive exercise for dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, eversion and inversion (manual resistance was applied for 3 to 5 seconds for ten repetitions in each cardinal plane).After resistance training the athletes will go for plyometric exercises and will follow the following guidelines.Tubing Exercises,Plyometric Ankle Jumps Ankle Circles

Resistance Exercises without Plyometric exercises

Other

We will apply protocol for 8 weeks 24 Sessions (3 sessions in a week) and 10 sec rest between each segment, 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Resistive training will start in the form of manual resistive exercise for dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, eversion and inversion (manual resistance was applied for 3 to 5 seconds for ten repetitions in each cardinal plane). While controlling the time that a maximal contraction will be maintained, the therapist will assure that the targeted musculature will being maximally loaded

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric pain rating scale

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

    NPRS consists of a scale with 0-10 readings. The zero denotes no pain while 1, 2, 3 denotes to mild pain, 4, 5, 6 denotes to moderate pain while 7-10 denotes to severe pain.

  2. Goniometer

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

    Active Range of Motion of the patient will be assessed using universal standard goniometer for ankle plantar flexion, dorsiflexion, inversion and eversion. All ranges will be assessed in sitting position.The data will be collected at baseline ankle goniometry. Goniometry will be performed using a universal goniometer with a measuring scale marked out at two-degree interval

  3. The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT)

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

    The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) is a widely accepted method of assessing dynamic postural stability. The Y Balance Test (YBT) is a commercially available device for measuring balance that uses 3 (anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral) of the 8 SEBT directions and has been advocated as a method for assessing dynamic balance.

  4. 1 RM Leg Press test

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

    A training load that corresponds to 60-80% of one repetition maximum to increase muscle strength in leg and ankle of subjects with a loading range of 10-12 repetitions. It will measure the strength in pre treatment and post treatment evaluation

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anam Dalawar, DPT

CONTACT

[email protected]

03403546668

Muhammad Atif Javed, PP-DPT

CONTACT

[email protected]

+92 3317491071

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Resistance Training With and Without Plyometric Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion, Dynamic Balance and Strength Among Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Aug 14, 2024
Registry last updated
Aug 14, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.