Orthopädie Sonnenhof
Bern, 3006, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Peter Diel, Dr.med.
CONTACT
Sabine Berger
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05238740
The aim of this study is to prospectively investigate the potential for bony fusion of ViviGen® bone graft substitute in comparison to rhBMP-2 in monosegmental ALIF procedure L5/S1 and in monosegmental XLIF procedure L4/5
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bern, 3006, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
Peter Diel, Dr.med.
CONTACT
Sabine Berger
CONTACT
The investigator hypothesize that
For patients included in the study, all follow-up is recorded, with regards to radiological and clinical outcome. Follow up will be evaluated after 14 days, 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Last follow up will be 1 year after surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients who have an indication for a monosegmental ALIF procedure on the L5/S1 segment or a monosegmental XLIF procedure on L4/5 (both ALIF and XLIF procedure with or without an additional pedicular stabilisation), e.g., treating conditions such as spondylosis, spondylolisthesis and degenerative disc disorders with back and/or leg pain
Exclusion criteria
It will investigate the radiological and clinical outcome of ALIF procedure L5/S1 and XLIF L4/L5 procedure using two arms/ treatments, namely either ViviGen® Bone Matrix (intervention group) or rhBMP-2 (control group). ViviGen®/ rhBMP-2 ratio will be 1:1.
It will investigate the radiological and clinical outcome of ALIF procedure L5/S1 and XLIF L4/L5 procedure using two arms/ treatments, namely either ViviGen® Bone Matrix (intervention group) or rhBMP-2 (control group). ViviGen®/ rhBMP-2 ratio will be 1:1.
Other names: InductOS
Time frame: 6 or 12 months after intervention
The rate of interbody bony fusion will be assessed by computed tomography and then by a radiologist 6 or 12 months after the intervention.
Modified Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser (BSF) classification of interbody fusion success will be defined as follows:
BSF-1: Radiographical pseudarthrosis is indicated by collapse of the construct, loss of disc height, vertebral slip, broken screws, displacement of the Synfix cage, or significant resorption of the bone graft, or lucency visible around the periphery of the graft or cage.
BSF-2: Radiographical locked pseudarthrosis is indicated by lucency visible in the middle of the cages with solid bone growing into the cage from each vertebral endplate.
BSF-3: Radiographical fusion: bone bridges at least half of the fusion area with at least the density originally achieved at surgery. Radiographical fusion through one cage (half of the fusion area) is considered to be mechanically solid fusion even if there is lucency on the opposite side.
Time frame: before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
The back pain visual analogue scale (VAS 1-10) will be assessed before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.
Time frame: before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
The leg pain visual analogue scale (VAS 1-10) will be assessed before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.
Time frame: before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
Quality of life will be assessed by using a simplified Spine Tango questionnaire and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI Score) before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.
Time frame: before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
Disability / limitations in the activities of daily living will be assessed by using a simplified Spine Tango questionnaire and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI Score) before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.
Time frame: before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
Disability / limitations at the workplace will be assessed by using a simplified Spine Tango questionnaire and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI Score) before intervention and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.
Time frame: 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
Patient satisfaction will be assessed by using a simplified Spine Tango questionnaire and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI Score) at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.
Time frame: 14 days, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention
Complication / side effects will be assessed by using a simplified Spine Tango questionnaire and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI Score) at 14 days, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.
Time frame: 12 months after intervention
Healthcare-costs will be assessed by using hospitalisation length of stay (LOS), occurrence and therapy of side effects/ adverse events and necessary revision operations at 12 months after intervention.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Diel Peter, Dr. med
CONTACT
Sabine Berger
CONTACT
Lindenhofgruppe AG
Industry
Comparison of Radiographic Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcome of Anterior Lumbar and Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Performed With Either Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 or ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix, a Prospective Randomised Assessor Blind, Monocentric Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03425682
Bone Diseases, Cervical Spondylosis
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02628210
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Disc Disease
Niagara Falls, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03321357
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Disc Disease
Naarden, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT02558621
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Disc Disease
Genolier, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial Details