Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01580202

Comparison of Prophylactic Antiviral Efficacy in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: Entecavir Versus Lamivudine

Patients with chronic hepatitis B who are undergoing anticancer chemotherapy are at risk of HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare. Lamivudine (LAM) prophylaxis has been recommended in such circumstance according to the practice guidelines despite of limited evidence. However, failure of LAM prophylaxis including virologic breakthrough and withdrawal hepatitis occurs occasionally, which may lead to liver-related morbidity and mortality as well as premature interruption or a delay of chemotherapy. Given relatively frequent drug resistance of LAM, studies on the proper prophylactic antiviral regimen is warranted. The present multicenter, prospective, randomized study aims to compare the effect of entecavir (ETV) versus LAM for the prevention of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients with hematologic and oncologic malignancy undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

National Cancer Center, Korea, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers who are undergoing anticancer chemotherapy are at risk of HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare, and lamivudine (LAM) prophylaxis is recommended according to the practice guidelines despite of limited evidence. However, failure of LAM prophylaxis defined as virologic breakthrough during LAM therapy and withdrawal hepatitis after discontinuation of LAM therapy occurs occasionally, which may lead to liver-related morbidity and mortality as well as premature interruption or a delay of chemotherapy. Considering that LAM therapy showed relatively higher rates of drug resistance and of withdrawal hepatitis, studies on the better choice of prophylactic antiviral regimen is warranted.

The purpose of our study is to conduct a multicenter, prospective, randomized study comparing the effect of entecavir (ETV) versus LAM for the prevention of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients with hematologic and oncologic malignancy undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy.

A total one hundred eighty HBV carriers with malignancy undergoing chemotherapy will be randomly assigned to each prophylactic therapy arm of ETV and LAM group. The primary endpoint of the study is the HBV reactivation rate during antiviral therapy and 6 months after discontinuation of prophylactic antiviral therapy.

If the prophylactic efficacy of ETV is superior to that of LAM, ETV will be the preferred prophylactic therapy for HBsAg-positive cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • positive for HBsAg for at least 6 months
  • inactive or active carrier of HBV with ALT level <2xULN, chronic hepatitis and compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A)
  • malignant tumors: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing systemic chemotherapy; solid tumors undergoing chemotherapy (including adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy)

Exclusion criteria

  • positive for anti-HCV or anti-HIV antibodies
  • decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma
  • expected survival of less than 1 year

Treatment and study plan

Entecavir

Drug

Entecavir 0.5mg daily per os

Lamivudine

Drug

lamivudine 100mg daily per os

Primary outcomes

  1. The cumulative probability of HBV reactivation

    Time frame: From the time of randomization until 24week after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis

    10-fold or more elevation in serum HBV DNA titers above nadir

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of HBV-related hepatitis flare

    Time frame: From the time of randomization until 24week after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis

    greater than 3-fold increase of ULN (upper limit of a normal reference value) of a serum ALT level that exceeded 100 IU/L during antiviral prophylaxis and 24 week after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis

  2. Cumulative probability of emergence of genotypic resistance

    Time frame: From the time of randomization until 24week after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis

    detection of mutations that have been shown in in vitro studies to confer resistance to either ETV or LAM

  3. Incidence of hepatic decompensation and liver-related mortality

    Time frame: From the time of randomization until 24week after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Open Labeled, Multicenter Study Comparing Entecavir Versus Lamivudine as Antiviral Prophylaxis for Patients With Hepatitis B Infection Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy for Malignant Tumors

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Apr 18, 2012
Registry last updated
Jun 29, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.