University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
NCT Number: NCT05978843
The goal of this study is to determine the relationship between produce prescription program 'dose' on benefit redemption, food insecurity, and fruit and vegetable consumption. Participants will be randomized to receive one of three fruit and vegetable benefit dose amounts for 6 months ($40, $80, or $110/month).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
Emerging evidence from the growing body of research around 'Food is Medicine' interventions shows promise that produce prescriptions (PPR) improve health by enabling purchases of healthy foods, reducing food insecurity, and improving diet quality. However, PPR amounts are often set seemingly arbitrarily, without clear connection to their intended purpose. In this study, investigators will conduct a three-armed randomized trial of 240 participants in Stockton, CA to test the impact of three 'doses' of a fruit and vegetable benefit on benefit redemption, food security, and fruit and vegetable intake. The goal of this study is to determine the relationship between PPR program 'dose' and the key intermediate outcomes of benefit redemption (primary outcome), food insecurity, and consumption of incentivized foods (secondary outcomes). Investigators will also seek to identify any 'ceiling effect' above which further increases in benefit value do not lead to further benefit redemption. This will be highly informative for subsequent PPR research. Investigators will leverage the existing infrastructure of the Vouchers 4 Veggies - EatSF produce prescription program to ensure feasibility.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will receive varying benefit amounts to purchase fruits and vegetables.
Time frame: Monthly for 6 months
Dollar amount of benefits redeemed (numerator) over total dollar amount of benefits distributed (denominator)
Time frame: 0, 3, and 6 months
Measured by NCI Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) and reported in cup-equivalents, a higher score indicates greater fruit and vegetable intake (better outcome)
Time frame: 0, 3, and 6 months
Measured by USDA 18-item food security module. A higher score indicates more severe food insecurity (worse outcome); Scores converted to Rasch measurement scale, with a higher score indicates more severe food insecurity
University of California, San Francisco
Other
Comparison of Produce Prescription Benefit Dosage on Redemption
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04171999
Food Insecurity
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07722195
Food Insecurity, Nutrition Assessment
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05191030
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04186689
Child Dental Behavior, Food Insecurity
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details