Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06049238

Comparison of Post Facilitation Stretch and Maitland Mobilization in Post-traumatic Stiff Elbow

This research study aims to bridge the gap in the existing literature by comparing the efficacy of Maitland mobilization and PFS techniques in the treatment of post-traumatic stiff elbow. While existing research has shown the favorable effects of joint mobilization and muscle energy techniques in other musculoskeletal conditions, there is a notable gap in understanding their efficacy in post-traumatic stiff elbow, particularly in Pakistan where no such study has been conducted. By investigating the comparative outcomes of these techniques, this research will contribute valuable clinical insights, potentially guiding clinicians in selecting the most effective treatment approach and laying the foundation for evidence-based treatment protocols tailored to patients with post-traumatic stiff elbow.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Railway General Hospital

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46300, Pakistan

About this study

The elbow being a highly constrained synovial hinge joint has a high propensity for degeneration and stiffness. There could be functional losses seen with even less severe loss of range of motion (ROM) at the elbow. The stiff or contracted elbow is defined as an elbow with a reduction in extension greater than 30 degrees, and/or a flexion less than 120 degrees. Although supination and pronation are often reduced as well, this will not be considered further as contracture of the elbow is not related to forearm rotation. The elbow is more prone to stiffness because Brachialis muscle lies directly over the anterior capsule, the anterior capsule tends to tear more frequently than posterior, all 3 elbow articulations exist in 1 capsule, the elbow is prone to development of Heterotrophic Ossification. Loss of terminal extension is less disabling than loss of the same degree of terminal flexion. It was a randomized, controlled trial, conducted among post-traumatic stiff elbow patients. Sample size was 32 by using G Power Calculator. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group after a baseline assessment with a lottery ticket and an opaque envelope. All participants in both groups were evaluated on two occasions: (i) baseline (ii) After 4 weeks of intervention

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 - 35 years
  • Both male and female
  • Patients with a limitation of elbow joint range of motion greater than 30 degrees in extension and less than 120 degrees in flexion.
  • 2-3 months after POP, splinting
  • Patients having bone ossification on X-ray findings will be included.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a history of rheumatoid arthritis or other inflammatory joint diseases
  • Mal-union or non- union elbow fracture.
  • Patients with a history of neuromuscular disorders or other conditions affecting muscle tone.
  • Patients with a history of previous elbow surgery or joint replacement.
  • Patients with a history of traumatic brain injury or other neurological conditions affecting upper limb function.
  • Patients with open reduction
  • Patient with elbow dislocation
  • Elbow joint mal-alignment
  • Heterotopic ossification
  • Myositis ossification or posttraumatic ankyloses.

Treatment and study plan

Maitland mobilization

Other
  • Hot Pack for 10 mints
  • Active and active-assisted exercises (10 reps x 3 sets) for the
  • Elbow flexion and extension
  • Wrist flexion and extension
  • Forearm supination and pronation

Post facilitation stretch

Other
  • Hot Pack for 10 mints
  • Active and active-assisted exercises (10 reps x 3 sets) for the
  • Elbow flexion and extension
  • Wrist flexion and extension
  • Forearm supination and pronation

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric pain rating scale

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Changes from baseline Numeric pain rating scale is a self-administered, or analyst reported, measuring instrument comprising of a scale that shows numerical ranges usually from 0-10 or 0-100. In this scale extreme or farthest point shows having 'no pain' to having 'extreme pain'.

  2. ROM Elbow (Flexion)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Changes from baseline range of motion( ROM) of elbow joint flexion is taken by using Goniometer.

  3. ROM Elbow (Extension)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Changes from baseline range of motion( ROM) of elbow joint extension is taken by using Goniometer.

  4. ROM Forearm (Supination)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Changes from baseline range of motion( ROM) of forearm supination is taken by using Goniometer.

  5. ROM Forearm (Pronation)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Changes from baseline range of motion (ROM) of forearm pronation is taken by using Goniometer.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disability

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Changes from baseline disability is measured through DASH (Disability of the arm, shoulder and hand) questionnaire. DASH questionnaire is a self reported area specific outcome measuring tool for symptoms and disabilities in upper limb. It mainly comprise of a 30-items scale which is further consist of questions related to difficulty in performing normal daily activities, scored on 5 response options. Scores for these 30 items then calculate on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Post Facilitation Stretch and Maitland Mobilization in Improving Range of Motion in Post-traumatic Stiff Elbow

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Sep 22, 2023
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.