Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03496493

COMparison of Portable Fingertip Versus Conventional Pulse OximeteRs Trial

Perioperative non-invasive measurement of a patient's peripheral arterial oxygen saturation has become an accepted standard of care endorsed by anaesthesiologists and their regulatory bodies throughout the world. Pulse oximeters are an integral item on the World Health Organisation's Surgical Safety Checklist which is performed prior to the commencement of every surgical procedure. They are also utilised by other medical professionals and patients in various scenarios. When compared to conventional bedside pulse oximeters, portable fingertip devices have the advantages of cost-effectiveness, high portability, ease of use and battery operation. A review of recent literature reveals a paucity of accuracy studies in adult patients with various comorbidities in the clinical setting. Most data has been obtained under ideal laboratory conditions utilizing healthy adult volunteers. This study aims to pragmatically investigate the performance of a portable fingertip pulse oximeter in adult patients in a hospital setting.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Groote Schuur Hospital

Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925, South Africa

About this study

The purpose of this prospective, quantitative study is to compare the agreement between the measured arterial oxygen saturation levels using a portable fingertip versus a conventional bedside pulse oximeter in adult surgical patients, presenting for elective and emergency surgery to Groote Schuur Hospital over a four-week period. Adult surgical patients, not meeting any exclusion criteria, who present for elective or emergency surgery will be recruited. 200 data pairs (SpO2, heart rate and skin tone) will be recorded in the perioperative period (operating rooms, recovery room and intensive care unit).

Existing monitoring devices will not be disturbed. The agreement between the two devices will be compared using a Bland-Altman plot, Microsoft Excel and SPSS software. A root mean square difference value will also be calculated from these values.

No sensitive or personal patient information will be recorded, and pulse oximetry is essential harmless. Potential cross-infection will be avoided by excluding patients with known communicable diseases or open wounds/ bodily fluids in the area to have the oximeter probes applied. The study devices will be disinfected after each use. Recruitment will not affect clinical care.

The significance of this study into the performance of portable fingertip pulse oximeters in adult surgical patients will result in the availability of cheaper devices, deemed as vital anaesthetic equipment by the WHO and various anaesthetic regulatory bodies, in lower income medical facilities. It will also give anaesthetists and other medical personal the confidence to make clinical decisions based on these highly portable devices, thereby making pulse oximeters more available in resource limited areas. It will also add further data to existing studies and help assess whether darker skin pigment affects the performance of these devices in the clinical setting, which is highly relevant in an African country like South Africa.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult surgical patients presenting for elective or emergency surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Contact precautions due to high risk of transmissable infectious disease
  • Significant hypotension or hypoperfusion (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, or hypothermia)
  • Motion artefacts due to excessive patient movements
  • Known presence of variant haemoglobin species (eg. carboxy- or methaemoglobin)
  • Intraoperative dye use (eg. methylene blue or indocyanine green)
  • Nail polish or black henna
  • Tape or bandages over the fingers
  • Absent/inadequate pulse oximetry tracing on existing monitor

Treatment and study plan

All patients

Device

Peripheral arterial oxygen saturation recording with both study devices

Other names: Nihon-Kohden Lifescope BSM 3562 patient monitor, Contec CMS50D fingertip pulse oximeter

Primary outcomes

  1. Saturation measurement agreement

    Time frame: 1 minute

    Bland-Altman analysis of saturation measurement pairs, with a priori acceptable limits of agreement (1.96 x SD measurement differences) within 3%. This is in accordance with ISO and FDA guidelines for testing of these devices (see relevant standard).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average root mean square difference

    Time frame: 1 minute

    Average root mean square difference in saturation pairs between the oximeters of less than 3%

  2. Skin tone effect

    Time frame: 1 minute

    Subgroup analysis of effect of skin tone (Fitzpatrick scale) on oximeter agreement (provisional on adequate recruitment across groups)

  3. Perfusion (pulse magnitude) effect on oximeter agreement

    Time frame: 1 minute

    Subgroup analysis of effect of magnitude of pulse waveform signal (as an indication of finger perfusion on oximeter agreement. This will be graded qualitatively as good, poor, or absent waveform, and is provisional on adequate recruitment across groups.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Cape Town

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Perioperative Comparison of the Agreement Between a Portable Fingertip Pulse Oximeter Versus Conventional Bedside Pulse Oximeter in Adult Patients

Acronym: COMFORT

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Apr 12, 2018
Registry last updated
Feb 21, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.