Pr Riethmuller Didier
Grenoble, 38043, France
NCT Number: NCT04849975
The main objective of this study is to compare pelvimetric measurements performed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and by the EOS imaging system.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Grenoble, 38043, France
During pregnancy, after failure of External Manual Version (EMV) in case of breech fetal presentation, a radiological pelvimetry is performed to evaluate the measurements of the pelvis and decide on the appropriate mode of delivery.
Several imaging modalities are used, including pelvic computed tomography (CT),and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis.
CT scan has the disadvantage of maternal irradiation and MRI has the disadvantage of an inaccurate morphological analysis.The EOS® system is an imaging tool used in radiopediatric to allow precise morphological analysis of bone masses with minimal irradiation.
The quality of the morphological analysis and measurements provided by the EOS® imaging system is the reason for proposing this study comparing the pelvimetric measurements obtained by MRI and by the EOS® imaging system.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The patients in this group are pregnant women after failure of external manual version (EMV) in case of breech fetal presentation. The participants will successively perform MRI pelvimetry (conventional management) and EOS imaging.
Time frame: Up to 1 day
Transverse Inlet Diameter Measurement obtained by EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Time frame: Up to 1 day
Ante posterior diameter of the pelvic inlet obtained by using EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Time frame: Up to 1 day
BiSpinous Diameter obtained by EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Time frame: Up to 1 day
Bi-ischiatic measurement obtained by EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Time frame: Up to 1 day
Magnin's Index calculation obtained by using EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Time frame: Up to 1 day
Caldwell and Moloy classification (scale) obtained by MRI and EOS® system is qualified.
Time frame: Up to 1 day
The measurement of the subpubic angle (in degree) obtained by MRI and EOS® system is qualified.
Time frame: Up to 1 day
The appearance of the obturating holes (descriptive analysis) obtained by MRI and EOS® system is qualified.
Time frame: Up to 1 day
Estimation of irradiation
Time frame: 4 days
Blind independent reading of MRI and EOS® images by two radiologists on two different days.
Time frame: 4 days
Blind independent reading of MRI and EOS® images by two independent clinician on two different days with conclusion on the mode of delivery.
University Hospital, Grenoble
Other
Acronym: CAPEOS®
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05224908
Abnormalities, Severe Teratoid, Breech Fetal Presentation
Clermont-Ferrand, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06593795
Breech Fetal Presentation, Breech Presentation
View Trial DetailsNCT02801201
Breech Presentation, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07071662
Breech Presentation, Breech Presentation at Term
Amiens, France
View Trial Details