Hong ji HEE
Daegu, 42601, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT05487339
The primary endpoint of this study was to identify if eretor spinae plane block (ESPB) has any effect in relieving low back pain or leg pain in lumbar radiculopathy. The secondary endpoint was to compare the number of spread level when upper or lower lumbar ESPB was performed.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Daegu, 42601, South Korea
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a less invasive, safer, and technically easy alternative procedure to conventional neuraxial anesthetic techniques. In contrast to common neuraxial techniques such as paravertebral and epidural injections, the ESPB targets an interfascial plane which is far from the spinal cord, root, and pleura. First applied to thoracic neuropathic pain, currently ESPB is being applied to postoperative pain control and includes variable clinical situations. In the abdomen and thoracic wall, thoracic ESPB can be applied for pain control after cardiac surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and thoracotomy. Recently, favorable postoperative pain control after lumbar spinal or lower limb surgeries has been reported with lumbar ESPB. In addition, ESPB has also been used for chronic pain conditions in the upper and lower extremities. To investigate the possible mechanism of action of the ESPB, many previous studies have focused on examining the physical spread of the injected agent. Commonly, contrast dye injections in human cadavers have been utilized to assess the spread level. Physical spread level was determined using various methods including direct dissection or sectioning, computed tomography (CT), thoracoscopic inspection, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with radiocontrast injection. Apart from human cadaver studies, physical spread level has been evaluated in alive patients using a variable volume of local anesthetics mixed with radiocontrast. However, these studies are limited by the small number of included patients. Therefore, the exact spread level of injected local anesthetics remains unclear and a study on a large number of patients is still required
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
fascial plane injection guided by fluoroscopy device
Time frame: baseline, 10 minutes after ESPB, 1 week after ESPB, 2 weeks after ESPB, 4 weeks after ESPB
numerical rating scale changes after ESPB among 5 times period
Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks after ESPB
back pain function scale changes after ESPB among 2 times period
Time frame: baseline, 1 minute after ESPB
fluoroscopic contrast medium spread level in the cranio-caudal direction
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Other
Comparison of Pain Relief and Spread Level in Upper and Lower Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06062108
Acute Pain, Chronic Pain
Draguignan, Var, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04629963
Chronic Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06114264
Back Pain, Behavior
Granada, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03106740
Back Ache, Back Pain
Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details