Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Using Corvis ST and ECD Following LASIK, PRK, CXL, Veriflex IOL and Implantable Collamer Lens
NCT06818461
Corneal Diseases, Eye Diseases
Mohandessin, Giza Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT05060094
To compare the quantitative and qualitative optical outcomes between single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) and off-flap epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK) in moderate to high myopia.we included patients with moderate to high myopia who were randomized to have TransPRK in one eye and Epi-LASIK in the other eye. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmological examinations, including uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities (CDVA), manifest refraction, intraocular pressure, anterior and posterior segment examination, corneal topography measured by Scheimpflug scanning-slit topographer (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH), contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic and mesopic conditions (CSV-1000E, Vector Vision Inc., Greenville, OH, USA) with correction by spectacles, ocular wavefront aberrometry (OPD-Scan II, Nidek Co. Ltd). At each follow-up, CS and aberration measures were repeated 3 times and the average value was analyzed. Optical parameters were repeated 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 22.0, SPSS, Chicago, Inc.). Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the normal distribution of variables. Student t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used based on the normality of data. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year–38 year
All sexes
Observational
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 2016.03.01-2018.06.05
ocular high-order aberrations including spherical, coma and trefoil aberrations were measured by OPD-Scan II
Time frame: 2016.03.01-2018.06.05
contrast sensitivity and contrast sensitivity under glare condition measurements were performed by the CSV-1000E which could test four spatial frequencies: 3,6,12 and 18 cycles/degree (cpd) at 2.5m. The contrast sensitivity was measured under photopic (596.7cd/㎡) and scotopic (0.01cd/㎡) conditions and the contrast sensitivity under glare condition was taken under scotopic condition with glare
Time frame: 2016.03.01-2018.06.05
Corneal haze grade was recorded according to Fantes's report: 0, no haze; 0.5, trace haze only could be seen by oblique illumination; 1,more visible haze not interfering with the visibility of iris details; 2, mild influence of iris details; 3, moderate influence of iris details; 4, marked haze obscuring the stroma of ablation area.
Time frame: 2016.03.01-2018.06.05
Subjective pain scores were evaluated on the third day according to a predetermined scale ranging from 0 to 5 as follows: 0, no pain or discomfort; 1, photophobia and tears; 2, photophobia and tears with mild pain; 3, photophobia and tears with moderate pain that does not require oral medication; 4, photophobia and tears with severe pain that oral medication can relieve; 5, photophobia and tears with severe pain that oral medication cannot relieve.
Wenzhou Medical University
Other
Comparison of Outcomes Between Single-step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Off-flap Epipolis Laser in Situ Keratomileusis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06818461
Corneal Diseases, Eye Diseases
Mohandessin, Giza Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04396990
Refractive Surgery
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05406973
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Maadi, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04684888
Eye Diseases, Refractive Errors
Baghdad, Iraq
View Trial Details