Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07080060

Comparison of Niel-Asher and Spencer Techniques in Frozen Shoulder Patients

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two manual therapy techniques-Niel-Asher Technique and Spencer Technique-when combined with conventional physiotherapy in treating patients with frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis). Frozen shoulder is a painful condition that limits movement and function of the shoulder joint. The study will include 44 adults aged 35 to 65 years who have been diagnosed with stage II frozen shoulder. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive standard physiotherapy, including heat therapy, TENS, and stretching exercises. In addition, one group will receive the Niel-Asher Technique, while the other group will receive the Spencer Technique. Pain, range of motion, and shoulder function will be measured before and after a 4-week treatment period using validated tools such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a goniometer, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). The goal is to determine which manual therapy technique is more effective in improving symptoms and function in patients with frozen shoulder.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

35 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Noor Thalassemia Foundation

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location contact

Dr Bashir

CONTACT

03034328759

About this study

Frozen shoulder, also known as adhesive capsulitis, is a common musculoskeletal condition characterised by pain, stiffness, and reduced range of motion of the glenohumeral joint. It is often associated with idiopathic onset, and can significantly impair daily activities and quality of life. While conventional physiotherapy-including modalities such as heat, TENS, and therapeutic exercise-forms the basis of treatment, there is growing evidence supporting the use of manual therapy techniques for enhanced outcomes.

This randomised controlled trial investigates the comparative effects of the Niel-Asher Technique and the Spencer Technique, each provided alongside standard conventional physiotherapy. A total of 44 patients meeting inclusion criteria (age 35-65 years, diagnosed with stage II adhesive capsulitis, and VAS pain score <7/10) will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups using computer-generated numbers and sealed envelope allocation.

Group A will receive the Niel-Asher Technique, which targets trigger points and myofascial release to reduce muscle guarding and pain. Group B will receive the Spencer Technique, a structured sequence of mobilisation techniques often used in osteopathic manual therapy. Both groups will also receive conventional therapy including moist heat, TENS, Codman exercises, finger ladder exercises, and capsular stretching.

The intervention will be administered three times per week over a 4-week period. Primary outcome measures include shoulder pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), range of motion measured by a universal goniometer, and functional status assessed by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

Data will be analysed using SPSS 25.0. Parametric or non-parametric tests will be applied based on data distribution. The findings of this study aim to provide evidence for clinical decision-making in the manual therapy treatment of frozen shoulder and may help establish more effective, hands-on techniques in physiotherapy practice.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age group between 35-65 years diagnosed with primary Adhesive Capsulitis.
  • Both gender male and female.
  • Both Active and passive Range of Motion is limited.
  • Stage II Frozen Shoulder patients (Freezing Stage,3-9 months).
  • More than 50% of range of motion is limited in Flexion, Abduction and External rotation as compared to unaffected side.
  • Pain reported on VAS score <7/10 in shoulder region.
  • Patients agree to sign written consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with systemic illness:
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Thyroid disorders.
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis, Malignancy.
  • Patients with mechanical injuries like:
  • Rotator Cuff injury, Ligamentous Injuries.23
  • Previous Surgery or Manipulation under Anesthesia.
  • Patients with Stage I, III, IV of Frozen Shoulder.
  • Patient reported with VAS score >7/10 in shoulder region.

Treatment and study plan

Niel-Asher Technique

Other

Participants in this group will receive the Niel-Asher Technique, a manual therapy approach focusing on trigger point release and myofascial decompression of the shoulder girdle. Treatment will involve structured pressure techniques applied to specific muscular trigger points including the infraspinatus, supraspinatus, subscapularis, and levator scapulae. The intervention will be delivered in side-lying and sitting positions.

Conventional physiotherapy, includes a 10-minute hot pack, 15-minute TENS, Codman exercises, finger ladder exercises (2-3 sets, 3-5 repetitions), and capsular stretching (20-30 sec hold, 2-4 repetitions). Sessions will be conducted 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

Spencer Technique

Other

Participants in this group will receive the Spencer Technique, an osteopathic manual therapy consisting of eight mobilization steps: extension, flexion, circumduction with compression, circumduction with distraction, abduction, adduction with external rotation, internal rotation, and traction stretch. Each movement will be performed with patient participation using muscle energy techniques.

Conventional physiotherapy, includes a 10-minute hot pack, 15-minute TENS, Codman exercises, finger ladder exercises (2-3 sets, 3-5 repetitions), and capsular stretching (20-30 sec hold, 2-4 repetitions). Sessions will be conducted 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 Weeks Post-Treatment

    Pain intensity in the affected shoulder will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a validated 10-point scale where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable pain." A decrease in score indicates pain reduction.

  2. Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 Weeks Post-Treatment

    Shoulder joint range of motion, including flexion, abduction, and external rotation, will be measured using a universal goniometer. ROM will be recorded in degrees. An increase in ROM values indicates functional improvement.

  3. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 Weeks Post-Treatment

    Shoulder function will be evaluated using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), a self-reported questionnaire assessing pain and disability. Scores range from 0 (no pain/disability) to 100 (maximum pain/disability). A reduction in score indicates functional improvement.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Amna Zia, Phd Scholar

CONTACT

[email protected]

03244686993

Samrood Akram, Phd Scholar

CONTACT

[email protected]

03324806143

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Niel-Asher Technique Versus Spencer Technique Along With Conventional Therapy on Pain, Range of Motion, and Functional Status in Frozen Shoulder Patients

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 23, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 23, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.