Comparison of Nexfin Pulse Contour Analysis and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Measurement of Cardiac Output

A growing interest in monitoring cardiac output (CO) non-invasively has emerged, however its determination has been difficult using the standard approaches. The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy and precision of pulse contour analysis (PCA) as compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Cardiac Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Heart Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

Mannheim, 68259, Germany

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

indication for CMR

Exclusion criteria

contraindication for CMR
claustrophobia
no consent obtained

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Is Arterial Pulse Contour Analysis Using Nexfin a New Option in the Non-invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output? - A Pilot Study

Important dates

Study start: 2011
Primary completion: 2011
Study completion: 2011
First posted: Jul 12, 2012
Registry last updated: Jul 12, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed