Nica Diana
Timișoara, Romania
NCT Number: NCT07462117
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results obtained using the conventional approach versus the modern laser method, by recording postoperative results
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me62 year–79 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Timișoara, Romania
The patients were divided in 3 equal groups and the vestibuloplasty was performed by conventional surgery on the right side and by laser for the left side of the maxilla. The former served as a Control group. There were utilized three types of lasers and consequently divided the patients in three observational study groups: for Group 1, the vestibuloplasty was performed by Nd-YAG laser, for Group 2 a diode laser was utilized , while Group 3 was treated with an Er-YAG laser.
An initial measurement of the vestibular depth was performed by using a millimeter markings William periodontal probe on three predetermined areas on each side: paramedian (next to the frenulum), antero-lateral (measured in the middle of the operated field), and lateral (at the most posterior place included in surgery). The measurements were performed 6 weeks postoperatively at the same levels as they were registered before surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
no comorbidities
-
For patients treated by Nd-YAG laser, the procedure was performed under local anesthesia . The parameters for the Nd-YAG laser are: center wavelength of 1064 nm, output power of 4 W, frequency equal to 25 Hz, Micro Short Pulse (MSP) mode, sapphire fiber of 300 micrometers in diameter, power density equal to 6229 W/cm2. Conventional vestibuloplasty was applied on the right side of the maxilla using Clark's method. A horizontal incision was performed at the mucogingival junction. The supraperiosteal dissection is performed and the muscles insertions were gradually dissected in an apical direction up to the desired vestibular depth. The mucosa of the inner side of the lip was undermined and the pedicled mucosal flap was secured to the periosteum at the new vestibule depth by using a 4-0 absorbable suture . The wound healed by second intention without any additional graft.
we utilized the Epic X TM laser from Biolase, with a center wavelength of 940 nm and a pre-initiated tip, in a contact, continuous mode, with an output energy of 3 W. Ablation with the laser tip began at the mucogingival junction with a horizontal movement directing the laser parallel to the bone, and thus slowly releasing the muscle fibers towards the new vestibule depth. The right side of the maxilla was treated by conventional vestibuloplasty, Clark s method
For the left side of the maxilla, we utilized an Er-YAG laser (Lightwalker, Fotona, Slovenia) equipped with a H14 handpiece, characterized by the following parameters: center wavelength of 2940 nm, contact mode, long pulse, energy of 200 mJ, frequency equal to 20 Hz, power of 4 W, water 2, gas 2. For the right side of the maxilla we applied conventional vestibuloplasty using Clark s method.
Time frame: days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively
Pain and discomfort values were compared between the conventional surgery and the Nd:YAG laser, diode laser, and Er-YAG laser groups by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The laser-treated sides have shown statistically significant reductions in both pain and discomfort scores at all considered timepoints (p < 0.05), as presented in the following.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Vestibular depth measurements were compared between the initial, the immediate postoperatively, and the 6-week postoperatively timepoints. Paired sample t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were utilized, depending on distribution, to evaluate changes within each technique (i.e., conventional and lasers).
University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara
Other
Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Three Dental Lasers Versusthe Conventional Scalpeltechnique in Vestibuloplasty
Acronym: 78/30102018
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03495700
Atrophy, Edentulous; Alveolar Process, Atrophy
Leuven, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05500911
Atrophy, Edentulous Alveolar Ridge Atrophy
Rome, Italy/Rome, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04136509
Alveolar Bone Loss, Atrophy
Budapest, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT05410405
Atrophy, Edentulous; Alveolar Process, Atrophy
Cassano Allo Ionio, CS, Italy
View Trial Details