Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03710096

Comparison of McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Insertion of a Double Lumen Tube by Residents

The insertion of double lumen tube is difficult even more if it is a resident with no experience. we think that using videolaryngoscopes for novice ones would facilitate insertion of double lumen tube thanks to the visualization on a LCD screen of the laryngeal structure.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Thoracic Injuries Wounds and Injuries

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU

Lille, France

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Insertion of double lumen tube

Exclusion criteria

  • Emergency surgery
  • Risk of inhalation
  • Person unable to consent
  • Persons deprived of liberty, under guardianship or trusteeship
  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Allergy to Tracrium, Propofol, Sufentanil

Treatment and study plan

macGrath

Device

in the mac grath group we use the videolaryngoscope macGrath as first-line for the insertion of double lumen tube

Macintosh's

Device

in the macintosh group we use the laryngoscope with Macintosh's blade as first-line for the insertion of double lumen tube

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of success of intubation in both groups at the first attempt

    Time frame: Baseline: one session

    the success is defined as a correct implementation of the probe endotracheal in double light by an internal of anesthesia in the 1st attempt.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Individual Determination of Cormack Stage

    Time frame: Baseline: one session

    scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy in case of tracheal intubation is difficult

  2. Rate of good positioning of double lumen tube confirmed by fibroscopy

    Time frame: Baseline: one session

  3. The rate of patients with an increase in systolic blood pressure of more than 20% compared to the measurement before insertion of the probe

    Time frame: Baseline: one session

  4. Intubation time

    Time frame: Baseline: one session

  5. The rate of patients with pharyngeal pains upon awakening

    Time frame: Baseline: one session

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Lille

Other

Registry information

Acronym: MacGrathDES

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Oct 17, 2018
Registry last updated
Nov 4, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.