Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02852135

Comparison of LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme for Efficient Ventilation During Lateral Positioned Laparoscopic Surgeres

The LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme are the third generation of LMA with potential advantages over the classic LMA.Several publications have reported the successful, safe use of Laryngeal Mask Airway devices in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. However, there have been no studies that have examined the application of LMA in patients during lateral positioned laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to observe the safety and efficacy when LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme used in lateral positioned laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

We undertook a single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.The patients were randomized to either LMA Proseal group or LMA Supreme group by computer generated allocation.

The patients were scheduled for elective lateral positioned laparoscopic surgery, such as laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic renal cyst decortication (LRCD) or laparoscopic adrenalectomy.Inclusion criteria for the patients were: Aged>18 years, ASA physical status grade I - Ⅲ and body mass index ≤30 kg.m-2. Exclusion criteria were: anticipated difficult airway (e.g., Modified Mallampati Class IV, oropharyngeal pathology), severe cardiopulmonary disease, increased risk of regurgitation and aspiration (e.g., gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and pregnant patients), and retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedures.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patients belong to ASA physical status grade I and Ⅲ, aged above 18 years and body weight less than 30 kg/m2,who underwent elective laparoscopic urology surgery in the lateral position.

Exclusion criteria

  • The patients with anticipated difficult airway (e.g., Modified Mallampati Class IV, oropharyngeal pathology), severe cardiopulmonary disease, increased risk of regurgitation and aspiration (e.g., gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and pregnant patients), and retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedures.

Treatment and study plan

LMA proseal

Device

After preoxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl and cisatracurium,LMA Proseal was inserted and cuff inflated in each group.

LMA Supreme

Device

After preoxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl and cisatracurium ,LMA Supreme was inserted and cuff inflated in each group.

Primary outcomes

  1. oropharyngeal seal pressure between LMA Proseal group and LMA Supreme group

    Time frame: intraoperative

    The equilibrating airway pressure was recorded when an audible leak occurred over the mouth.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ventilatory efficiency scores for the LMAs

    Time frame: intraoperative

  2. Adverse effects in two groups

    Time frame: intraoperative

    The adverse effects including regurgitation,hypoxemia,dysphonia,blood stained after LMA removal, and postoperative sore throat.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Changhai Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme for Efficient Ventilation During Lateral Positioned Laparoscopic Surgeries

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Aug 2, 2016
Registry last updated
Mar 9, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.