Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03375099

Comparison of Lethal Means Counseling and an Active Control Condition, With and Without Provision of Gun Locks

In 2013, the National Guard reported a suicide rate that was substantially higher than both the general population and the active duty component of the United States military. The prototypical National Guard suicide decedent appears to be a young male firearm owner not currently deployed who dies using his own gun. Prior research within the military has revealed that soldiers are unlikely to seek out or engage in mental health services. In sum, current best practices in suicide risk assessment are poorly equipped to identify the individuals most likely to die by suicide. This study aims to examine the acceptability, feasibility, and utility of a single lethal means counseling session as part of a suicide prevention approach targeting demographic groups overrepresented in National Guard firearm suicides. 232 firearm-owning National Guard personnel will be randomized to one of four conditions, each of which requires a single 15-25 minute session: (1) lethal means counseling (2) lethal means counseling plus the provision of free gun locks (3) health and stress control condition (4) health and stress control condition plus the provision of free gun locks. The investigators anticipate that those who receive lethal means counseling will subsequently store their personal firearms more safely and report being more willing to store their firearms away from the home during any hypothetical future suicidal crisis. The overarching goal of each hypothesis is to examine the extent to which gun owning young male National Guard personnel at varying levels of suicide risk are willing to engage in means safety.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Southern Mississippi

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 30406, United States

About this study

In 2013, the National Guard reported a suicide rate that was substantially higher than both the general population and the active duty component of the United States military. The prototypical National Guard suicide decedent appears to be a young male firearm owner not currently deployed who dies using his own gun. Prior research within the military has revealed that soldiers are unlikely to seek out or engage in mental health services. In sum, current best practices in suicide risk assessment are poorly equipped to identify the individuals most likely to die by suicide. This study aims to examine the acceptability, feasibility, and utility of a single lethal means counseling session as part of a suicide prevention approach targeting demographic groups overrepresented in National Guard firearm suicides. The study will utilize a 2x2 Factorial Design: Intervention (Lethal Means Counseling, Health and Stress Control) X Gun-Lock (Provided, Not Provided). Participants will be 232 firearm owning National Guard personnel. Lethal Means Counseling comprises education on risk factors for suicide, information on preventative resources, and encouragement to store guns safely and to temporarily remove guns during high risk periods. The Health and Stress Program is designed to control for effects of general mental and physical health education in the active condition. Each condition utilizes a motivational interviewing framework. The overarching goal of each hypothesis is to examine the extent to which gun owning young male National Guard personnel at varying levels of suicide risk are willing to engage in safety planning and find means safety approaches acceptable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Affiliated with the National Guard
  • Owns at least one personal firearm
  • Speaks English fluently

Exclusion criteria

  • N/A

Treatment and study plan

Lethal Means Counseling

Behavioral

Single session motivational interviewing based interaction aimed to increase the safe storage of firearms in an effort to reduce suicide risk.

Health and Stress Reduction

Behavioral

Single session motivational interviewing based interaction aimed to reduce vulnerability to negative outcomes across four domains: sleep, diet, exercise, and stress.

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Safe Storage of Personal Firearms

    Time frame: Change will be assessed at 3- and 6-month follow-up

    Whether firearms are stored (1) in a lock box or gun safe (yes/no) (2) loaded (yes/no) (3) separate from ammunition (yes/no) and (4) using a locking device (e.g. cable lock; yes/no)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived Cultural Competence and Likelihood of Effectiveness of Lethal Means Counseling [Acceptability and Perceived Utility]

    Time frame: This will be assessed immediately after the intervention at baseline

    Degree to which lethal means counseling is experienced as culturally respectful and likely to be beneficial

  2. Changes in Willingness to Seek Mental Health Care in the Future

    Time frame: Change will be assessed immediately after the intervention and at 3- and 6-month follow-up

    Degree of openness to seeking future mental health care after receiving this intervention

  3. Changes Openness to Means Safety in the Future

    Time frame: Change will be assessed immediately after the intervention and at 3- and 6-month follow-up

    Degree of openness to voluntarily and temporarily storing firearms away from the home during hypothetical future suicidal crises

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Southern Mississippi

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Utah

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Lethal Means Counseling and an Active Control Condition, With and Without Provision of Gun Locks for Improving Safe Storage of Personal Firearms Among National Guard Personnel

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Dec 15, 2017
Registry last updated
May 20, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.