Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06397495

Comparison of Learning Models in Physical Therapy Education

With the pandemic affecting the world, education systems have been subjected to mandatory changes without sufficient thought on teaching content, delivery and pedagogy. In this process, physiotherapy courses involving psychomotor skills such as manual therapy became difficult to teach and evaluate. Although the pandemic is over, it is suggested that technological approaches should be used in learning systems and incorporated into physiotherapy education. These technology-supported education models are called blended education models. The use of the flipped training model, a variant of blended training models, can improve practical skill performance. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effect of two different models on the quality of teaching and learning in cervical region manual therapy teaching. Suleyman Demirel University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation senior students (n=100) will be randomly divided into two groups. The control group (n=49) will be given monologue education with in-class team-based traditional education model. The practical part of the course will be taught in the classroom and applied with patient-clinician role model technique. Homework will be assigned for students to read scientific articles and analyze case examples. The entire six-week teaching program will take place in the classroom. The experimental group (n=51) will be applied the flipped model. The theoretical and practical knowledge of the course will be provided at home with the EdPuzzle education platform. They will be encouraged to read articles and analyze cases at home. The classroom environment will be used to ask questions related to the theoretical part of the course and to practice the practical application as a patient/clinician role model. The seven-week teaching program is planned in the classroom and home environment. In the evaluation of the research, explanatory sequential design method from mixed research methods will be applied. Pre-test/post-test/knowledge retention test, instructional materials motivation questionnaire and skill level/performance evaluation form will be used to evaluate the quantitative data. A lesson observation form will be used to evaluate whether the trainer provided the same competence to both groups. Semi-structured case study will be used to evaluate the reverse-face model to the experimental group with qualitative data.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–27 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Süleyman Demirel Univesity

Isparta, 32000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Not to have participated in a vocational course program on manual therapy of the cervical region,
  • Sufficient internet access,
  • Acceptance of distance education if included in the experimental group,
  • Having and actively using a cell phone or computer with a smart operating system,
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • The student wants to quit the study and does not fill in the data collection forms

Treatment and study plan

Education

Other

Cervical region manual therapy training will be given with flipped learning models.

Primary outcomes

  1. Academic motivation survey data

    Time frame: 1 year

    Academic motivation survey data will be the first data to be obtained between the groups.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Isparta University of Applied Sciences

Other

Collaborators

  • Suleyman Demirel University
  • The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Flipped and Team-Based Learning Models in Cervical Region Manual Therapy Teaching: A Mixed Method Study

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2024
First posted
May 3, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 31, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.