Medical University Vienna, University Clinic for Clinical Pharmacology
Vienna, 1090, Austria
NCT Number: NCT02988739
It is the aim of the present study to compare the immunogenicity induced by a laser-assisted epidermally administered seasonal influenza vaccine to an intradermally administered seasonal influenza vaccine.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–30 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Vienna, 1090, Austria
The skin is an attractive tissue for vaccination due to the impact of the cutaneous micro-environment on the adaptive and non-adaptive immune responses. Conventionally many vaccines are administered subcutaneously. Immune-competent cells however are not resident in the subcutaneous fat tissue, but instead are located in the epidermis and the dermis of the skin. Depending on the targeted skin layer and administration method, different immunological outcomes are thus anticipated following vaccination.
In the present study, the immunogenicity (in terms of activation of B-cell mediated and T-cell mediated immune responses) of laser-assisted epidermally administered seasonal influenza vaccine will be compared to needle-based intradermal administration of the same seasonal influenza vaccine.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
influenza vaccine containing 15 µg haemagglutinin of three seasonal influenza virus strains recommended by WHO
Other names: INTANZA
Fraction laser device to apply micorpores of defined depth and density into skin.
Other names: Pantec P.L.E.A.S.E.
Time frame: day 1 and day 29
HAI against each vaccine virus strain
Time frame: day 1, day 15 and day 29
Number of subjects achieving a T-cell stimulation index of >3
Time frame: day 1 and day 29
Proportion of subjects achieving at least a four fold HAI titer increase against each vaccine virus strain from day 1 to day 29
Time frame: day 1 and day 29
Proportion of subjects achieving a HAI titer of > 1:40 against each vaccine virus strain at day 29
Time frame: day 1 and day 29
GMFR of antibody titers against each vaccine virus strain from day 1 to day 29.
Time frame: day 1 , day 15 and day 29
Magnitude of T-cell response (SI values) against influenza vaccine on day 1, day 15 and day 29.
Time frame: day 1 to day 29
Pantec Biosolutions AG
Industry
Safety and Immunogenicity of Laser Assisted Epidermally Administered Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Comparison to Intradermally Administered Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04723771
Infections, Influenza in Human
Athens, Attica, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT04794829
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05447078
Healthy Volunteers, Infections
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05397119
Infections, Influenza, Human
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details