Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05143658

Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Techniques in Uterine-preserving Apical Prolapsus Repair

The aim of the study will be to compare the laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) and laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) techniques in the management of uterine sparing apical prolapse (POP-Q >2) at 1 year and yearly up to 2 years.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Prolapse

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, 34307, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Primary and secondary endpoints:

Primary outcome measures will be the subjective cure of prolapse ("absence or presence of a bulge in the vagina"), objective success with anatomic absence of advanced prolapse at POP-Q sites Ba, C and Bp defined as less than 1 cm individually and as a total.

Secondary outcome measures include all other parameters such as perioperative outcomes, patient satisfaction, quality of life outcomes, complications, scores on questionnaires, and reoperations.

The study protocol will be submitted to the institutional review boards of every participating study site and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants on enrolment.

Project design: The investigators will perform an international multicentre single-blind randomized controlled trial with participating our tertiary referral hospital.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with symptomatic stage 2 or greater (point C -1 or more pelvic organ prolapse quantification POP-Q) apical prolapse

Exclusion criteria

  • Women not eligible for surgery for medical or anesthesiological reasons
  • Inability to comprehend questionnaires
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Inability to return for a review
  • Prior laparoscopic prolapse repair
  • Prior vaginal mesh prolapse procedure
  • Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
  • Women who don't want uterine preserving surgery
  • Pregnancy
  • Age <18 years, Age >45 years

Treatment and study plan

LLS versus LP

Procedure

Procedure: Laparoscopic repair of anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse Surgical correction of anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse by laparoscopy

Primary outcomes

  1. Subjective cure rate of prolapse

    Time frame: [ Time Frame: 12 months after intervention ]

    Provided by the patient's feeling of the "Absence of a bulge in the vagina"

  2. Objective success

    Time frame: [ Time Frame: 12 months after intervention ]

    Defined as anatomic absence of advanced prolapse at POP-Q sites Ba, C and Bp defined as less than 1 cm individually and as a total

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prolapse-related Quality of life

    Time frame: [ Time Frame: 12 months after intervention ]

    This will be assessed using a validated questionnaire (Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire P-QoL) The questionnaire contains 9 domains. Each answer of the patient will have values that range between 1 to 4 or 1 to 5 for the 1st question only). (1 very good 4/5 very poor). There is no overall score. A symptomatic woman might have only one domain impaired and another one might have all domains impaired. We consider both of them symptomatic but in different or same aspects of quality of life. To differentiate different domains, it is important for the decision of our surgery (we will be careful in shortening and narrowing a vagina of a woman who had only a preoperative high (impaired) Personal relationships domain score and other domains in the normal range).

    This will also help us in the follow up visits.

  2. Failure (%)

    Time frame: [ Time Frame: 12 months after intervention ]

    Recurrence rate

  3. Complications

    Time frame: [ Time Frame: 12 months after intervention ]

    İnjury ( bowel, intestinal, blood vessel injuries, mesh erosions)

  4. Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)

    Time frame: [ Time Frame: 12 months after intervention ]

    The PISQ-12 is a self-adminestered questionnaire that evaluates sexual function of women with pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. The questionnaire has 12 items. Other than the first 4 questions that are scored from 4 to 0, all questions are scored from 0 to 4. The total score is calculated with totaling the score of each question. The maximum score is 48. Higher scores show good sexual functioning of women.

  5. Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7)

    Time frame: [ Time Frame: 12 months after intervention ]

    evaluating the impact of urinary incontinence

  6. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI - 20)

    Time frame: [ Time Frame: 12 months after intervention ]

    evaluating the bowel, bladder, or pelvic symptoms

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2024
First posted
Dec 3, 2021
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.