Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01161121

Comparison of Intravenous Adenosine Infusion With Regadenoson Bolus for Inducing Maximal Coronary Hyperemia

The purpose of this study is to determine if regadenoson is as safe and effective as adenosine when used in the cardiac catheterization lab during measurement of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve. The study hypothesis is the assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in the catheterization lab can be performed with equivalent accuracy when hyperemia is induced with IV Regadenoson compared with IV Adenosine without compromising patient safety.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

Primary location

University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Patients with clinical indications to be assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be included. Following diagnostic angiography in the catheterization lab, the patient will have a guide catheter placed in the artery to be assessed followed by placing a pressure guidewire down the coronary vessel and past the lesion of interest. FFR will be measured in the traditional manner, with intravenous adenosine infusing at 140 mcg/kg/min until maximal steady state hyperemia is reached. At this point, the FFR will be recorded as Pd (distal pressure from the pressure wire in the coronary artery) divided by Pa (proximal pressure from the guide catheter). The adenosine infusion will then be stopped and the patient's hemodynamics allowed to return to baseline. Once baseline state is again achieved, an intravenous bolus of regadenson (0.4 mg) will be given and FFR will be remeasured as the lowest steady state Pd/Pa. Patients will be enrolled at two sites, The University of Florida - where FFR will be measured alone, and Saint Louis University, where coronary flow will be measured simultaneously to evaluate the effect of regadenoson on coronary flow velocity as compared to adenosine. The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the FFR achieved with adeonsine to that obtained with regadenoson.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • male or female patients greater than 18 years old (If female, pt. must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile, or be non-pregnant as determined by a negative urine or serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG) pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to enrollment.
  • Provided written consent approved by Institutional Review Board and provided Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization
  • Have at least one coronary stenosis (greater or equal to 40% but less than 70& narrowing by visual inspection) and technically accessible coronary artery into which the pressure wire may be introduced.

Exclusion criteria

  • ST elevation myocardial infarction
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Pregnancy
  • Total vessel occlusion
  • Extremely tortuous coronary arteries
  • Second and third degree heart block without pacemaker
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and active bronchospasm
  • Less than age 18 years
  • Have received theophylline, aminophylline, pentoxifylline or dipyridamole within 12 hours of FFR measurement.
  • Has severe 3 vessel disease defined by >80% luminal narrowing by visual inspection
  • Known hypersensitivity to adenosine or regadenoson
  • Recent uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmia
  • History of greater than Type I atrioventricular block, symptomatic resting bradycardia, sick sinus syndrome (without permanent pacemaker)
  • History of heart transplantation

Treatment and study plan

Adenosine

Drug

Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV adenosine 140 mcg/kg/min for 2 minutes.

Other names: Adenoscan(adenosine)

Regadenoson

Drug

Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV regadenoson 0.4 mg over 10 seconds.

Other names: Lexiscan

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in FFR Between IV Adenosine and IV Regadenoson

    Time frame: At maximal, steady-state hyperemia

    FFR (as calculated by the ratio of lowest Pd/Pa at maximal hyperemia) was compared between hyperemia achieved with adenosine and with regadenoson

Secondary outcomes

  1. Heart Rate Changes With Drug

    Time frame: During drug infusion and until restoration of baseline hemodynamics

    Maximal heart rate documented following the administration of each agent

  2. Side Effects of Medication Administration

    Time frame: During drug infusion and until restoration of baseline hemodynamics

    Chest pain, chest discomfort, burning, flushing, headache, nausea, or shortness of breath

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

St. Louis University

Other

Collaborators

  • Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
  • University of Florida

Registry information

Official study title

Utilization of Lexiscan (Regadenoson)in the Cardiac Catheterization Lab to Achieve Maximal Hyperemia for Coronary Physiologic Assessment With Fractional Flow Reserve

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Jul 13, 2010
Registry last updated
Jun 23, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.