Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT07638579

Comparison of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring With Transcartilaginous Needle Electrodes Versus Endotracheal Tube Electrodes in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is among the most important complications in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the RLN using electrodes placed on the endotracheal tube is now a standard procedure to facilitate nerve detection and visual identification, to maintain its anatomical and functional integrity and to reduce the rate of nerve injuries. The most common neuromonitoring technique involves the use of electrodes located on the surface of the endotracheal tube, which are in contact with the vocal cords and record the electromyographic signals caused by the electrical stimulation of the RLN by a probe manipulated by the surgeon.

However, this technique has certain disadvantages:

(i) Correct placement of the endotracheal tube is technically demanding and requires an experienced anesthesiologist.

(ii) Improper placement of the tube by the anesthesiologist, its displacement during patient hyperextended neck positioning, intraoperative rotation, or saliva interference between the tube electrodes and the vocal cords may all lead to inability to receive adequate signals and limit the sensitivity of the method.

(iii) Intraoperative readjustment of the tube position can be time-consuming and difficult.

The above neuromonitoring method is associated with a high negative predictive value (92-100%) according to the literature. However, its positive predictive value ranges between 10% and 90% which means that in the case of a decrease or loss of the initial neurostimulation signal, the true injury of the RLN is 10-90%.

Neuromonitoring with intraoperative placement of electrodes in the thyroid cartilage is an alternative method, in which the electrodes are placed by the surgeon in the perichondrium of the thyroid cartilage at the beginning of the operation. Their placement is simple, with almost no learning curve and does not require further preparation of the surrounding structures. Similarly to the endotracheal tube electrode, these also record the electromyografic signal from the electrical stimulation of the laryngeal muscles and RLN, however they are more sensitive in detecting the movement of the vocal cords and can potentially record a higher and more stable neurostimulation signal. In this way, the rate of false positive signal loss could be reduced compared to the technique of neuromonitoring with the electrodes on the endotracheal tube.

This PhD thesis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of neuromonitoring with transcartilaginous needle electrodes versus endotracheal tube electrodes in thyroid and parathyroid surgeries. It is a prospective multicenter study of diagnostic accuracy, with paired design, of the neuromonitoring signals (amplitude - latency), which will be obtained based on the standard algorithm V1, R1, EBSLN1, EBSLN2, R2, V2, before and after the end of the manipulations in each thyroid lobe, using both aforementioned techniques. Their positive and negative predictive value will be compared and evaluated with regard to the injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. To achieve the above, at least 300 patients who will undergo thyroid or parathyroid gland surgery will be evaluated and intraoperatively will undergo neuromonitoring with both methods. After the surgery, on the 1st postoperative day, all patients will undergo laryngoscopy to exclude or confirm injury of the RLN.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

2nd Surgical Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Thessaloniki, Greece

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients undergoing thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy via cervical incision
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Age < 18 years
  • Remote access thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy
  • Presence of thyroglossal duct cyst

Treatment and study plan

intraoperative neuromonitoring with transcartilaginous needle electrodes versus endotracheal tube electrodes in thyroid and parathyroid surgery

Device

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of neuromonitoring with transcartilaginous needle electrodes versus endotracheal tube electrodes in thyroid and parathyroid surgeries. It is a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy, with paired design, of the neuromonitoring signals (amplitude - latency), which will be obtained based on the standard algorithm V1, R1, EBSLN1, EBSLN2, R2, V2, before and after the end of the manipulations in each thyroid lobe, using both aforementioned techniques. Their positive and negative predictive value will be compared and evaluated with regard to the injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. After the surgery, on the 1st postoperative day, all patients will undergo laryngoscopy to exclude or confirm injury of the RLN.

It is the first study that evaluates simultaneously both intraoperative neuromonitoring methods in the same patient and at such large group of patients.

Primary outcomes

  1. positive predictive value

    Time frame: during surgery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 10, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.