Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07656285

Comparison of Immediate Changes in Cervical Range of Motion Following Cervical Extension and Downslip Mobilizations.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy seated cervical extension glides vs supine downslip glides, on both cervical rotation range of motion and patient comfort. Information gathered from this study may be used to help clinicians determine the most beneficial methods of cervical mobilizations as a rehabilitation tool.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Missouri State University - Physical Therapy Clinic

Springfield, Missouri, 65810, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Kim Ennis

CONTACT

[email protected]

5176143690

About this study

Subjects were randomized to either the Downslips group or the Seated AP Extension Glide. Prior to and immediately after mobilization, bilateral cervical rotation range of motion measurements were taken in seated using the Cervical Range of Motion device (CROM) which has been shown to have good validity and reliability. The starting sides of both cervical spine mobilizations were chosen at the start of data collection. After that, both therapists alternated the side to begin the mobilization with each new subject. Each mobilization was performed 5x40" with a twenty second rest between. All five mobilizations are performed first on one side, then the contralateral side in the same manner, prior to the subject returning to the seated position for retesting of their cervical rotation range of motion with the CROM. The same researcher performed the CROM measurement pre- and post-mobilization rotational testing to reduce interrater error. Following the final CROM measurement, the subject was then asked to rate their perceived comfort with the technique using a modified Visual Analogue Scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most uncomfortable.

The downslip mobilization is completed in supine, with the practitioner positioned at the patient's head. The practitioner places their second metacarpophalangeal joint of the mobilization hand on the articular pillar of C2 while the stabilizing hand is on the occiput allowing for motion to occur.

Mobilization will be in an direction that is caudal and dorsal towards the subject's contralateral hip for 5x40" with a 20" rest in between. The supine downslip mobilization will be performed by the same therapist bilaterally for all subjects; this therapist has more than thirteen years of clinical experience with advanced manual therapy training. The Seated AP Extension mobilization is completed with the subject(s) seated in the Frankfort neutral position. The therapist starts by palpating the articular pillar. The stabilizing hand is placed on C3's lamina, applying a force perpendicular to a line through the oribita to block the caudal segment. The therapist's mobilizing hand will be supinated so that their lateral 5th metacarpal is on the lamina of C2. The subject is then brought into extension and rotation to the C2-3 segment and a caudal-dorsal mobilization is applied respecting the cervical spines facet joint orientation of 45 degrees for 5x40" with a 20" rest in between. The Supine AP Extension mobilization will be performed by the same therapist bilaterally for all subjects; this therapist has more than thirteen years of clinical experience with advanced manual therapy training.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy individuals
  • 18-45 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

  • current or previous history of neck pain;
  • cervical spine instability;
  • history of cervical spine surgery;
  • neurological issues;
  • contraindications to mobilization including fractures, coagulation issues, and osteoporosis

Treatment and study plan

Cervical Downslip Mobilization

Other

Mobilization in supine on the C2-3 articular pillar in a direction that is caudal-medial-ventral.

Seated Cervical Extension Glide

Other

Mobilization of C2 on C3 in a direction that is dorsal, lateral, and caudal.

Primary outcomes

  1. Cervical Range of Motion

    Time frame: Immediately following mobilization

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Kim Ennis, PT, ScD, OCS, FAAOMPT

CONTACT

[email protected]

15176143690

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Missouri State University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Cervical Rotation Range of Motion Improvements Following Cervical Extension vs Downslip Mobilizations

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 18, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.