Critical care medicine Ramathibodi hospital, 270 Rama 6 Rd. Phayatai
Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
NCT Number: NCT06242236
The objective of this research is to utilize respiratory effort parameters as a tool to assist in adjusting sedative drug levels for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit, in comparison to the conventional usual care approach.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
The research investigators conduct daily screening for new participation in the intensive care unit and semi-intensive care unit, selecting individuals based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. In cases where patients require sedative drugs before the research investigators assessment, such as when patients are agitated or have difficulty asynchrony, standard sedative dosages are allowed in emergency rooms and the intensive care unit.
The randomization involves creating equally distributed tokens for both groups (1:1 ratio), with the total number (n) representing the population to be included in the study. These tokens are placed in a random box for the randomization process. The basic information of research participants, laboratory, and mechanical ventilator parameters will be collected.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The intervention involves the measurement of respiratory effort using P0.1 and Pocc then calculating to dynamic transpulmonary pressure swing (Predicted ΔPL) to adjust sedative drug dosage.
Other names: The respiratory effort parameters
Time frame: After intubated patients were recruited until successful extubation or dead/failed extubation with in 28 days.
To compare the number of ventilator-free days at 28 days between the method of measuring respiratory effort using the Dynamic Transpulmonary Pressure Swing (Predicted ΔPL) and P0.1, as opposed to usual care, for adjusting sedative drug dosages in patients with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation.
Time frame: After intubated patients were recruited until alive or dead with in 28 days.
To compare 28-day mortality rate in patients adjusting sedative drug dosages using the Dynamic Transpulmonary Pressure Swing (Predicted ΔPL) and P0.1 methods compared to usual care.
Time frame: After intubated patients were recruited until 48 hours
To investigate the pulmonary mechanics at 48 hours after sedative drug adjustment using the Dynamic Transpulmonary Pressure Swing (Predicted ΔPL) and P0.1 methods compared to usual care.
Time frame: After intubated patients were recruited until 48 hours
To determine an appropriate level of respiratory effort and reduce excessive and inadequate effort factors by administering suitable sedative drugs to patients, minimizing lung injury from various causes, with the goal of facilitating the shortest possible duration of mechanical ventilation.
Time frame: After intubated patients were recruited until 48 hours
To compare the amount of sedative drugs administered to patients within 48 hours after intubation in the intervention group, adjusting drug dosages using the Dynamic Transpulmonary Pressure Swing (Predicted ΔPL) and P0.1 guidance, and the control group, adjusting drug dosages using Usual care guidance. The results will be presented separately for each type of drug, including Propofol infusion rate (mcg/kg/min), midazolam-equivalent infusion rate (mg/hc), fentanyl-equivalent infusion rate (mcg/hd), dexmedetomidine infusion rate (mcg/kg/h).
Ramathibodi Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04402879
ARDS, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06823804
ARDS, Lung Diseases
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03764319
ARDS, Acute Lung Injury
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT04663802
ARDS, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Plainsboro, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details