Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06678308

Comparison of Glue with Microparticles in Prostatic Artery Embolization

Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is an alternative treatment to surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It has been practised since 2012 and numerous publications have proved not only its safety but also its efficacy.

The principle of PAE is to occlude the prostatic arteries with an 'embolising agent', which will result in ischaemia and necrosis of part of the adenomatous tissue of the prostate.

The reference embolisation agent is a suspension of calibrated trisacryl microparticles 300-500 microns in size.

Recently, the use of glue has been retrospectively studied with acceptable efficacy and safety.

In this context, where only the results of retrospective studies are available, it is necessary to initiate comparative prospective studies to assess the efficacy and safety of the glue compared with calibrated microparticles.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

50 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is an alternative treatment to surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and its place is recognised in the recommendations of the Male Voiding Disorders Committee (French Urological Association). It has been practised since 2012 (Carnevale et al, 2020), and numerous publications have proved not only its safety but also its efficacy (Malling et al, 2019).

The principle of PAE is to occlude the prostatic arteries with an 'embolising agent', which will result in ischaemia and necrosis of part of the adenomatous tissue of the prostate.

The reference embolisation agent, used by the majority of expert prostate embolisation teams, is a suspension of calibrated trisacryl microparticles 300-500 microns in size.

Recently, the use of glue has been retrospectively studied with acceptable efficacy and safety (Loffroy et al, 2021). Another retrospective comparative study (Salet et al, 2022) reported no significant difference in clinical efficacy between the use of glue and 300-500 micron trisacryl particles.

In this context, where only the results of retrospective studies are available, it is necessary to initiate comparative prospective studies to assess the efficacy and safety of the glue compared with calibrated microparticles.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male patient aged ≥ 50 years and ≤ 80 years
  • Patient with symptomatic BPH (prostatic volume ≥ 40 ml measured on prostatic MRI, IPSS ≥ 8, uroflowmetry < 15 ml/s).
  • Patient failing or intolerant to drug treatment (tadalafil and/or one of the alpha-blockers, alfuzosin, tamsulosin, silodosin or doxazosin).

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient with advanced and complicated BPH on renal and bladder ultrasound:

Severe obstruction related bladder wall lesions : >3 micro-diverticula or single or multiple diverticula with a sac diameter > 10 mm.

Chronic dilatation of the excretory cavities : diameter of one or both pyelons >15 mm.

  • Patient with suspected prostate or bladder cancer on MRI
  • Patients with moderate or severe chronic renal failure, with creatinine clearance < 40 ml/min.
  • Patient with prostate or bladder cancer diagnosed by biopsy in the 6 months preceding the inclusion visit.
  • Patient with an active urinary tract infection
  • Patient already included and participating in another clinical study.

Treatment and study plan

Embolisation with Magic Glue®

Device

Magic Glue® will be injected within prostatic arteries, leading to ischaemia and necrosis of part of the adenomatous tissue of the prostate gland

Embolisation with Embosphere®

Device

Embosphere® will be injected within prostatic arteries, leading to ischaemia and necrosis of part of the adenomatous tissue of the prostate gland

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of embolisation

    Time frame: Month 3

    Efficacy of embolisation will be assessed with IPSS score (International Prostate Symptoms Score). IPSS questionnaire consists of 7 questions (ranging from 0 to 5) on mictional difficulties for a maximum total of 35 points (0 means no mictional difficulty).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-Mictional Residue

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12

    Post-Mictional Residue will be assessed will be measured in ml by ultrasound

  2. Prostatic infarct areas

    Time frame: Month 3

    Prostatic infarct areas will be measured in mm3 on MRI

  3. Sexual function

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12

    Sexual function will be assessed with IIEF5 questionnaire (International Index of Erectile Function form 5) (0 - 25 points). Score lower than 10 means severe erectile dysfunction whereas score higher than 20 means normal erectile function.

  4. Patient quality of life

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12

    Patient quality of life will be assessed with IPSS quality of life question (1 - 7). 1 means patient is very satisfied of his/her quality of life

  5. Prostatic Serum Antigen

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12

    Prostatic Serum Antigen (PSA) will be measured from blood sample. Normal value should be lower than 4 ng/ml

  6. Urinary flow

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12

    Urinary flow will be measured in ml/s by flow measurement

  7. Prostatic volume

    Time frame: Month 3 and Month 12

    Prostatic volume will be in ml on MRI

  8. Efficacy of embolisation

    Time frame: Month 1 and Month 12

    Efficacy of embolisation will be assessed with IPSS score (International Prostate Symptoms Score). IPSS questionnaire consists of 7 questions (ranging from 0 to 5) on mictional difficulties for a maximum total of 35 points (0 means no mictional difficulty).

  9. Safety of embolisation

    Time frame: Day 15, Month 3 and Month 12

    Safety of embolisation will be assessed with post-empbolisation symptoms description and other adverse events description

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Grégory AMOUYAL, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+ 33 6 80 70 40 40

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Almaviva Sante

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Glue with Calibrated Microparticles in Prostatic Artery Embolisation As a Treatment for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Acronym: EMBOLICOL

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Nov 7, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 7, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.