Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02934347

Comparison of Glottic Views and Intubation Times in the Supine and 25 Degree Back-up Positions

Our hypothesis is that the view of the glottis may be improved by putting all patients requiring intubation in the ramped or back up position while maintaining the classic sniffing position.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

The sniffing position has traditionally been considered the optimal head position for direct laryngoscopy and is the usual patient position preferred by most anaesthetists. In theory, neck flexion aligns the pharyngeal and laryngeal axes, and head extension at the atlanto-occipital joint aligns the oral axis with these two axes allowing the line of sight to fall on the glottis. It is recognized as the starting head position for direct laryngoscopy because it provides the best chance of adequate exposure.

However the sniffing position does not guarantee adequate exposure in all patients because many other anatomical factors control the final degree of visualization.

To achieve a proper sniffing position in obese patients, the "ramped" (or the back-up) position has been used as this produces better neck flexion and head extension in these patients when compared to the horizontal supine position. Also the forces required to elevate and move the tongue and other tissues out of the line of sight are less when the patients are ramped.

Our hypothesis is that the view of the glottis may be improved by putting all (ie not only obese) patients requiring intubation in the ramped or back up position while maintaining the classic sniffing position.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult surgical patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients less than 18 years old,
  • Patients recognised to have difficult airways where an alternative method of intubation (e.g. fibre optic) was the method of choice,
  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery where patient positioning and data collection might cause delay (e.g. exsanguinating patients) or where the supine position is not optimal (e.g. brisk bleeding into the upper airway),
  • Patients requiring rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia

Treatment and study plan

25 degree back-up position

Procedure

To test whether a 25 degree back-up position improves laryngeal views and makes intubation easier compared to the standard horizontal position

Primary outcomes

  1. The Best Glottic View Obtained During Laryngoscopy

    Time frame: The view of the glottis was measured once while the patient was being intubated

    The best glottic view obtained during laryngoscopy was assessed using the Cormack and Lehane classification by the anaesthetist performing the laryngoscopy.

    The Cormack and Lehane classifies glottic views as follows: Grade 1: Most of the glottis is visible, Grade 2: At best almost half of the glottis is seen, at worst only the posterior tip of the arytenoids is seen., Grade 3: Only the epiglottis is visible, Grade 4: No laryngeal structures are visible.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation

    Time frame: Once at intubation

    The number of attempts at both laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were recorded

  2. The Use of Ancillary Equipment

    Time frame: Once at intubation

    The use of ancillary equipment (e.g. bougie, alternative laryngoscope blades) and manoeuvres (e.g. laryngeal manipulation) were recorded but applied at the intubating anaesthetist's discretion

  3. The Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitor

    Time frame: Once at intubation

    The time between the beginning of laryngoscopy and detection of carbon dioxide on the end-tidal carbon dioxide monitor after the successful placement of the tracheal tube was recorded

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

Other Gov

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2015
First posted
Oct 17, 2016
Registry last updated
May 11, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.