Department of Surgery ,Mayo Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Dr. Abdur Rehman, MBBS
CONTACT
Muhammad Zeeshan Sarwar, MBBS,FCPS
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07672145
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard surgical treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease due to its advantages in reducing postoperative pain and recovery times. However, surgeons continue to debate the optimal port site for retrieving the gallbladder specimen from the abdominal cavity, as this choice can influence wound-related morbidity.
Traditionally, the gallbladder is extracted through the infraumbilical port site. While effective, this route is associated with a potential risk of port-site infections due to bacterial colonization within the umbilicus and risk of contamination during specimen extraction. Retrieving the gallbladder through the subxiphoid port has been proposed as an alternative technique that may utilize a cleaner surgical site, potentially reducing patient pain scores and regional wound complications.
This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to directly compare the clinical outcomes of extracting the gallbladder through the subxiphoid port versus the traditional infraumbilical port. The study will evaluate and compare mean postoperative pain intensity within the first 24 hours, as well as the regional development of port-site infections, seromas, or hematomas within 7 days following elective laparoscopic surgery.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Location status: Recruiting
Dr. Abdur Rehman, MBBS
CONTACT
Muhammad Zeeshan Sarwar, MBBS,FCPS
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
This study is structured as a parallel-group randomized controlled trial conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore, to evaluate the optimal retrieval site for specimen extraction during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Eligible patients aged 18 to 60 years diagnosed with symptomatic gallstone disease who meet all predefined inclusion criteria will be invited to participate. All surgical procedures will be standardized and performed under general anesthesia by a senior consultant surgeon using a conventional four-port technique. Following the successful mobilization of the gallbladder, the specimen will be enclosed safely inside a sterile endo-bag to control potential bile contamination.
Patients will then be dynamically allocated via a computer-generated randomization system into one of two surgical groups:
Postoperatively, all participating patients will be systematically tracked for primary and secondary outcomes. Postoperative physical distress will be quantified while the patient is at rest using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at regular intervals of 6, 12, and 24 hours. Additionally, specialized clinical assessments will be performed through the first 7 postoperative days to monitor and log the occurrence of port-site infections, staged using the Southampton Wound Classification system, alongside local complications including seroma or hematoma formation.
Statistical analyses will be executed using SPSS, utilizing independent t-tests for quantitative variables and Chi-square testing for qualitative categorical outcomes to evaluate significance.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Following standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the cystic duct and artery are clipped and divided. The gallbladder specimen is then placed within a sterile endo-bag and extracted through the subxiphoid port site under direct laparoscopic visualization to minimize bile spillage and abdominal wall contamination.
Following standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the cystic duct and artery are clipped and divided. The gallbladder specimen is then placed within a sterile endo-bag and extracted through the primary camera port site at the infraumbilical incision under direct laparoscopic visualization.
Time frame: At 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery
Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed while the patient is at rest using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Worst Possible Pain".
Time frame: Up to 7 postoperative days
The presence and severity of port-site infections will be evaluated and graded according to the objective criteria of the Southampton Wound Classification System (Grades 0 to V)
Time frame: Up to 7 postoperative days
The development of local wound site complications, specifically tracking the presence or absence of a clinically or ultrasonographically confirmed seroma (clear fluid collection) or hematoma (localized blood collection).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Dr Abdur Rehman, MBBS
CONTACT
Dr Muhammad Abdullah, MBBS
CONTACT
King Edward Medical University
Other
Comparison of Gallbladder Extraction Via the Subxiphoid Port and the Infraumbilical Port During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05208385
Biliary Tract Diseases, Cholelithiasis
Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05975385
Biliary Tract Diseases, Cholecystitis
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07552701
Acute Cholecystitis, Biliary Tract Diseases
Çorum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06656299
Biliary Tract Diseases, Bronchial Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details