Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04597801

Comparison of Fluorescein-INtra-VItal Microscopy Versus Conventional Frozen Section Diagnosis for intraOperative Histopathological Evaluation

With the appliance of the in-vivo microscopy after Fluorescein staining, the investigators hypothesize that the preliminary in-vivo histopathological diagnostic accuracy is not inferior to conventional frozen section analysis accuracy when using the final histopathological result as gold standard.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

In neurosurgery, intraoperative histopathological frozen section analysis (cryosection) offers a crucial tool for the rapid assessment of tumor entity and dignity and the creation of tumor-free resection margins. The method, however, remains unreliable and time-consuming, sometimes prolonging surgical times and demonstrating diagnostic accuracy for frozen section in glioma ranging from 78.4% to 95% in comparison to the final histopathology, depending on the technique used.2,3 To combat these shortcomings, another promising adjunct was developed in the form of intraoperative dye-dependent in-vivo microscopy, for which there has been little scientific evidence so far, with only a few recent studies exploring its utility, safety and general applicability. The theoretical idea of the technique in principle is to allow for histopathological assessment of tumor tissue in-vivo without the need for time-consuming fixation and transport of resected tissue biopsies, aiming for a so-called in-situ digital biopsy and thereby substantially improving operative precision and surgical times. It stands to reason that the benefit in visualization provided by fluorescein staining may further be driven through in-vivo microscopy. Altogether, with the use of fluorescein sodium in in-vivo microscopy, the operating surgeon may in the future inspect supposedly malignant fluorescent tissue first-hand, evaluate it for tumorous cells in real-time and adjust their resection strategy in a far more immediate fashion.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Signed informed consent
  • Suspected intracranial tumor revealed by cranial magnetic resonance imaging (according to clinical routine) scheduled for resection with intraoperative frozen section evaluation

Exclusion criteria

  • Known allergic or suspected allergic reactions to fluorescein sodium
  • Liver disease, CHILD B or C
  • Patients under medication with beta-blockers, digoxin, chinidin and probenecid as well as inhibitors of glucuronidation, such as immunosuppressants, when the medication must not be discontinued perioperatively
  • Patients with relevant congenital limitations of glucuronidation performance (e.g. Rotor syndrome, Gilbert-Meulengracht syndrome, Crigler-Najjar syndrome)
  • Patients with terminal renal failure requiring hemodialysis
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Pregnancy (incl. positive pregnancy test)
  • Women of childbearing age must be non-lactating and surgically sterile or using a highly effective method of birth control and have a negative pregnancy test. Acceptable methods of birth control with a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correct are such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs), sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner.

Treatment and study plan

Alcon

Drug

Fluorescein sodium is administered intravenously with a bolus injection of 5 mg per kg of bodyweight 20-40 minutes prior to the planned tumor resection.

Other names: Fluorescein sodium

Primary outcomes

  1. Significance: The diagnostic accuracies of the individual methods used for preliminary intraoperative histopathological diagnosis (D1:fluorescein sodium with in-vivo microscopy versus D2: preliminary frozen section assessment)

    Time frame: 14 days

    The primary objective of the clinical trial is to compare the significance of intravenously applied fluorescein as staining agent for assessment of brain tissue texture via in-vivo confocal microscopy with the conventional intraoperative histological frozen section analysis of identical brain tissue samples in the same patient. Both methods will be compared in terms of their accuracy using the standard of practice, the final pathological diagnosis (immunochemistry/molecular pathology).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of adverse events during surgery and until end of follow-up period (Safety Assessment)

    Time frame: 24 days

    To assess the safety of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) as staining agent for in-vivo confocal microscopy by documentation of adverse events during surgery and until end of follow-up period.

  2. Analysis of surgical time span (comparison of the time span to conduct the assessment of brain tissue texture with fluorescein intervention with the time span to conduct assessment of conventional intraoperative frozen section intervention.

    Time frame: 14 days

    Analysis of surgical time span: comparison of the time span to conduct the assessment of brain tissue texture with fluorescein intervention with the time span to conduct assessment of conventional intraoperative frozen section intervention.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Technical University of Munich

Other

Collaborators

  • Carl Zeiss Meditec AG

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Fluorescein-INtra-VItal Microscopy Versus Conventional Frozen Section Diagnosis for intraOperative Histopathological Evaluation (INVIVO)

Acronym: INVIVO

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Oct 22, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 10, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.