Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02076828

Comparison of Ferrous Sulfate, Polymaltose Complex and Iron-zinc in Iron Deficiency Anemia

The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of the different oral iron preparations in children with IDA.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

6 month–180 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hacettepe University

Ankara, Ankara/Sihhiye, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Iron deficiency (ID) is the most common cause of the anemia throughout the world, with almost half of the population in developing countries suffering from ID. Children with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) may have functional consequences including impaired motor and physical growth. In the case of IDA, the underlying cause should be identified and treated. Iron supplementation remains an important strategy for the prevention and treatment of IDA and can produce substantial improvements in the functional performance of iron deficient individuals.

The iron-containing preparations available on the market vary widely in dosage, salt, and chemical state of iron (ferrous or ferric form). Current treatment strategy for IDA involves the oral use of Fe2+ salts (Fe SO4) and Fe3+ polymaltose complexes (FeOH3). Most of these preparations vary in their bioavailability, efficacy, side effects, and cost. Animal studies have not shown any significant difference in their oral bioavailability. However, in clinical practice, bivalent iron salts such as ferrous sulfate (Fe-S), ferrous gluconate, and ferrous fumarate are more widely used and are preferred over ferric iron preparations. Fe-S preparations usually present good bioavailability (between 10 and 15 %), while bioavailability of ferric iron preparations is 3 to 4 times less than that of conventional Fe-S. This is due to the extremely poor solubility of ferric iron in alkaline media and the fact that ferric iron needs to be transformed into ferrous iron before being absorbed. For this reason, among ferrous preparations, Fe-S remains the established and the standard treatment of ID due to its acceptable tolerability, high effectiveness, and low cost. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of the different oral iron preparations in children with IDA.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The children with IDA, aged between 6 months and 15 years, were randomly included in Fe-S (Ferro Sanol® sp.)(Group I), Fe-OH-PM (Santafer® sp.)(Group II), and Fe-Zn (Ferro Zinc® sp.)(Group III). IDA was defined as hemoglobin (Hgb), serum iron and ferritin levels below -2SD according to age and gender.

Exclusion criteria

  • The main exclusion criteria were anemia due to other causes except IDA
  • Severe concurrent illness (cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic)
  • Known hypersensitivity to ferrous or ferric preparations
  • Malignancy of any type
  • Children with thalassemia major, sickle cell anemia or other hemoglobinopathies, hemolytic anemia or aplastic or hypoplastic anemia.

Treatment and study plan

Ferro Sanol® sp

Drug

The children with IDA that included in Fe-S (Ferro Sanol® sp.)(Group I) were treated with a therapeutic dose Ferro Sanol® sp as 6 mg/kg/day in the first 2 months and followed by maintenance treatment at a dosage of 2 mg/kg/day for the next 2 months.

Other names: Fe-S (Ferro Sanol® sp)(Group I)

Santafer® sp.

Drug

The children with IDA that included in Fe-OH-PM (Santafer® sp.)(Group II) were treated with a therapeutic dose Santafer® as 6 mg/kg/day in the first 2 months and followed by maintenance treatment at a dosage of 2 mg/kg/day for the next 2 months.

Other names: Fe-OH-PM (Santafer® sp.)(Group II)

Ferro Zinc® sp

Drug

The children with IDA that included in Fe-Zn (Ferro Zinc® sp.)(Group III) were treated with a therapeutic dose Ferro Zinc® sp. as 6 mg/kg/day in the first 2 months and followed by maintenance treatment at a dosage of 2 mg/kg/day for the next 2 months.

Other names: Fe-Zn (Ferro Zinc® sp.)(Group III)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Hb levels at 2 months

    Time frame: 2 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Iron levels at 2 months.

    Time frame: 2 Months

Other outcomes

  1. Improvements of the symptoms

    Time frame: 2 Months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2011
First posted
Mar 4, 2014
Registry last updated
Mar 4, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.