Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02096627

Comparison of Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery to Conventional Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery

In this project, the investigators aim to compare the safety, efficacy, and predictability outcomes of conventional CEIOL surgery to Femtosecond-laser-assisted CEIOL (FLACS) in an effort to improve cataract surgery outcomes. The investigators hypothesis is that FLACS may lead to preservation of endothelial cells compared to conventional CE IOL.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, 21044, United States

About this study

This study will only include patients who are eligible to undergo cataract surgery. All patients will receive treatment that is FDA approved for cataract surgery. Because all study participants will have been scheduled for elective cataract extraction regardless of their participation in this study, there will be little or no additional surgical risk associated with participation. A total of 720 patients are expected to be enrolled in the study during a period of 2 years. The investigators will recruit patients with bilateral operable cataracts. One eye will undergo cataract surgery using conventional cataract extraction technique including phacoemulsification whereas the second eye will undergo FLACS. No significant increased risk to the patient is expected in either arm of the study compared to routine cataract surgery. The patients will be examined as per previous post-operative cataract surgery guidelines on POD1, POW1, POM1, POM3, POM6, POY1 and POY2. The only treatment difference will take place at the time of the cataract surgery. Post-operatively, endothelial cell count will be obtained by the no-touch technology of specular microscopy at baseline as well as three months after surgery. If the study ends prematurely, the investigators do not anticipate any significant change in the care of the patient.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients older than 18 years of age
  • Ability to understand and sign an informed consent
  • Visually significant cataract eligible to undergo cataract extraction by phacoemulsification with primary intraocular lens implantation in at least 1 eye
  • Ability and commitment to follow up for 18 months after surgery
  • No other ocular pathology and no previous/concurrent surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Any other ocular pathology that may affect best-corrected visual acuity
  • Previous or concurrent ocular surgery
  • Subjects who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to be pregnant during the course of the study.
  • Patients with keratoconus or keratectasia
  • Patients who are blind on one eye

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. endothelial cell density three months after conventional CEIOL or FLACS compared to baseline

    Time frame: up to 2 years

    endothelial cell density will be compared at baseline and three months after a patient undergoes FLACS or Conventional CE IOL to see which technique causes less endothelial cell loss.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery to Conventional Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery on Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Mar 26, 2014
Registry last updated
Nov 16, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.