Texas Health Resources, Presbyterian Hospital
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
NCT Number: NCT01508715
The purpose of this study is to compare two different physical therapy exercise programs in persons who have shoulder pain in order to determine if they have a different affect on pain level and ability to use the injured shoulder after treatment. Both exercise groups will attend physical therapy for an hour,two to three times a week, for eight weeks. The first two weeks of therapy sessions will involve learning the exercises and testing to determine what weight to use during exercises. One group will perform a traditional therapy exercise program for shoulders using hand weights. The other group will perform a version of the same shoulder exercises but with a different exercise technique. Exercises in both programs are part of the standard of care for shoulder impingement in physical therapy but one program concentrates on the lowering portion of the exercise (eccentrics) while the other emphasizes the lifting portion of the exercise (concentrics). Both groups will perform the same warm-up, stretching, and cool-down exercises. Participants will also be required to perform a daily home exercise program of stretches and range of motion that will take about 20 minutes to complete. Exercise testing will determine the hand weight resistance used by each person during their therapy sessions and re-testing will occur every two weeks to determine any changes in the weight used for the exercises to keep them challenging. Pain level, ability to use the injured arm for daily activities, strength, and amount of movement in the shoulder, will be measured at the start of physical therapy and after five and eight weeks (end of study) of the exercise treatments. A concurrent study investigating the reliability of the shoulder motion and strength measurements used in the larger study will also be performed.
Research hypotheses:
1. Adults with shoulder pain who complete the eccentric progressive resistive exercise intervention will demonstrate significantly greater improvements in the outcome measures at three weeks, earlier in the intervention, than the concentric progressive resistive exercise intervention group. 2. Adults with shoulder pain who perform progressive resistive exercise interventions, regardless of contraction type, will demonstrate significant improvement in the shoulder outcome measures at three and six weeks of intervention.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
This study will be a prospective, repeated-measure, randomized clinical trial comparing shoulder outcome measures in adults with SAIS following eccentric or concentric progressive resistance exercise intervention programs. Subjects: 36 persons with SAIS, aged 18 and older, will be recruited from the Texas Health Resources Dallas outpatient rehabilitation department and referring physicians. Procedures: Participants will be randomly assigned to either a concentric or eccentric intervention group. Participants will complete outcome measures for pain intensity, shoulder function, shoulder pain-free active range of motion (AROM) of flexion and scapular plane elevation, and shoulder pain-free strength of external rotation and abduction. Outcomes will be assessed by an investigator blinded to group assignment at baseline and after three and six weeks of intervention. Interventions will consist of supervised exercise sessions three times a week. Exercise progression will follow a standardized and systematic approach. The reliability of the AROM and strength outcome measures will be assessed concurrently using a random subset of six participants from each group.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Both groups will perform the seated "full can", sidelying internal rotation (IR), sidelying external rotation (ER) with towel roll, supine protraction at 120° of flexion, sidelying horizontal abduction, sidelying abduction, and seated pulley extension using resistance weights in the participant's pain-free shoulder motion. One group will complete only the eccentric portion of the exercise actively, the other will complete only the concentric portion actively. The treating physical therapist will reposition the weights to avoid active resistance occuring in the opposite direction of the desired intervention. Both groups will use 70% of their predicted one repetition maximum (1RM), progressing to 80% with 1RM reassessed and training weight adjusted every two weeks.
Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks and 6 weeks of intervention
Measured by change in numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)score for shoulder pain, change in disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) self-report of function score, change in shoulder abduction and external rotation strength assessed with a hand-held dynamometer, and change in shoulder flexion and scapular plane elevation pain-free range of motion assessed with a digital inclinometer.
Time frame: over course of study
A subset of participants will be tested for strength and range of motion outcomes twice at each time frame by the same examiner in order to analyze intratester reliability of the testing protocols using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients.
Texas Woman's University
Other
Comparison of an Eccentric Exercise Intervention to a Concentric Exercise Intervention in Adults With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06092502
Arthralgia, Joint Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05957952
Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07410208
Behavior, Functionality
Istanbul, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07484360
Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details