Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06470022

Comparison of Evolut FX Versus Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia.

To compare outcome in patients randomized to treatment with Evolut FX versus Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, 8200, Denmark

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Christian J Terkelsen, Prof

CONTACT

004540135388

About this study

The purpose of the "Compare-TAVI" organization is to ensure a continuous comparison of the TAVI-valves implanted, and to monitor long-term valve performances.

Purpose of present study:

To compare outcome in patients randomized to treatment with Evolut FX versus Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia.

Hypotheses:

  • Evolut FX is non-inferior to Edwards Sapien 3 Resilia with regard to the combined endpoint (death, stroke, moderate/severe aortic regurgitation, moderate/severe valve deterioration) between the two valves being compared.
  • There is no difference between valves in secondary safety and efficacy endpoints (see below)
  • There is no difference in Aortic Regurgitation fraction (ARF) and Effective Orifice Area (EOA) measured by CMR (CMR-substudy, N=166)
  • There is no difference in EOA measured invasively during dobutamine stress (hemodynamic substudy, N=440).
  • There is no difference in occurrence of Hypoathenuated Leaflet Thickening (HALT) measured by CT (CT-substudy, N=778).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient more than 18 years of age.
  • Patient eligible for both Evolut FX and Edwards Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia according to a TAVI heart team conference.
  • The center experience for each of the valves considered should be more than 15 cases a year, and the treating physician should have implanted at least 15 of each valve used in the trial.
  • The center volume should be more than 75 cases a year.
  • The patient has given signed informed consent.
  • TAVI performed via the femoral artery.

Exclusion criteria

None

Treatment and study plan

Medtronic Evolut FX

Device

TAVI performed with Medtronic Evolut FX

Edwards Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia

Device

TAVI performed with Edwards Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality, stroke, moderate/major aortic regurgitation, moderate/severe THV deterioration

    Time frame: 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year

    The primary composite endpoint is at one-year, and a non-inferiority test is performed. See separate statistical analysis plan. Separate analyses of each component of the primary outcome will be presented, in accordance with the FDA guidelines and EMA guidelines, i.e. mortality, stroke, moderate/severe aortic regurgitation and moderate/severe THV deterioration to better understand their contribution to the primary endpoint. If non-inferiority is proven for the primary composite endpoint, a split alfa is used to test for superiority if possible (alfa=0.025) and to test secondary safety and efficacy endpoints (Total alfa=0.025 for these). The composite endpoint will be re-analyzed after 3-, 5- and 10-year as superiority analyses.

Secondary outcomes

  1. TAVI-related complications

    Time frame: 7-days

    conversion to open surgery during implantation, unplanned use of cardiopulmonary support (CPS), coronary artery obstruction, ventricular septal perforation, mitral valve apparatus damage or dysfunction, cardiac tamponade / pericardial effusion resulting in pericardiocentesis, valve embolization, valve migration, need for TAVI-in-TAVI deployment, using VARC-3 criteria 10, or annulus rupture, aortic rupture/perforation, aortic dissection, or other shunts than VSD.

  2. Proportion with successful implantation of the chosen valve.

    Time frame: 7-days

    This means no need for more than 1 TAVI valve, no change to another valve than planned during the procedure because it was impossible to implant the valve planned, and no conversion to surgery or procedure-related death.

  3. SMART criteria for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction through 12 months

    Time frame: 1-year

    composed of the following components: (1) hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction, defined as aortic valve mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg at any time up to the 12-month visit echo; (2) nonstructural valve dysfunction, defined as severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or ≥ moderate total aortic regurgitation at any time up to the 12-month visit echo; (3) clinical valve thrombosis; (4) endocarditis; or (5) aortic valve reintervention.

  4. Pacemaker-implantation

    Time frame: 1-year

    New pace-maker implantation in pacemaker-naive patients.

  5. Vascular and access-related complications (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-days

    Major vascular access site and access-related complications resulting in endovascular or open surgery using VARC-3 criteria

  6. Bleeding and transfusion (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-days

    Major bleeding resulting in drop in hgb-level ≥1.86 mmol/l and/or erythrocyte transfusion ≥ 2 units, modified from BARC type 3-5 criteria

  7. Endocarditis (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year

    According to VARC-3 criteria.

  8. Reoperation (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year

    Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention, Surgical Aortic Valve Intervention or Balloon Angioplasty

  9. Moderate/severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day

    Effective Orifice Area (EOA)/body surface area ≤0.85 cm2/m2 if BMI<30 kg/cm2 or <=0.70 cm2/m2 if BMI>=30 kg/cm2., according to VARC-3 criteria.

  10. Mean gradient (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year

    Aortic mean gradient, mmHg, as evaluated by Echocardiograpy Core-laboratory.

  11. Pacemaker-implantation (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day prior to TAVI, 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year

    New pacemaker in pacemaker naive-patients.

  12. Readmission for congestive heart failure (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year.

    Adjudicated. Only monitored until first confirmed case.

  13. AMI (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year.

    Acute Myocardial Infarction. Adjudicated. Only monitored until first confirmed case.

  14. Revascularization (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year.

    PCI (Percutaneous coronary intervention) CABG (Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting), not scheduled before TAVI

  15. Atrial fibrillation (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year.

    Newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation/flutter

  16. Kidney injury (exploratory only)

    Time frame: 30-day

    Increase in renal creatinine level more than to ≥200% (AKIN stage 2-3, VARC-3 criteria) or resulting in dialysis (AKIN stage 4) according to VARC-3 criteria.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Christian J Terkelsen, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4540135388

Helle Bargsteen

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4578452112

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Christian Juhl Terkelsen

Other

Collaborators

  • Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Comparison of Evolut FX Versus Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia. The Compare-TAVI 2 Trial

Acronym: COMPARE-TAVI

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2036
First posted
Jun 24, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.