Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00997763

Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stent vs Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of coronary stenting with the Everolimus- Eluting stent compared to the Sirolimus-Eluting stent in the treatment of de novo coronary stenosis in patients with diabetic patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon-si, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Diabetic patients often present unfavorable coronary anatomy with small and diffusely diseased vessels (1) and exhibit exaggerated neointimal hyperplasia after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation as compared with nondiabetics (2). Although drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation significantly reduced the neointimal hyperplasia and angiographic restenosis compared to BMS in diabetic patients (3), presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) have been still associated with an increased risk of restenosis and unfavorable clinical outcomes in the era of DES (4,5). Recently, the relative efficacies of sirolimua-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients with DM have been evaluated in randomized and registry studies (6-10). The present study, ESSENCE-DIABETES Study, compare 8-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with sirolimus-eluting stent (CYPHER) or everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE V)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diabetic patients with angina and documented ischemia or patients with documented silent ischemia
  • Patients who are eligible for intracoronary stenting
  • Age >18 years, <75 ages
  • De novo lesion
  • Percent diameter stenosis ≥50%
  • Reference vessel size ≥ 2.5 mm by visual estimation

Exclusion criteria

  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  • Pregnant state
  • Known hypersensitivity or contra-indication to contrast agent and heparin
  • Limited life-expectancy (less than 1 year)
  • Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction on admission
  • Characteristics of lesion
  • Left main disease
  • In-stent restenosis
  • Graft vessels
  • Hematological disease (Neutropenia <3000/mm3, Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm3)
  • Hepatic dysfunction, liver enzyme (ALT and AST) elevation ≥ 3 times normal
  • Renal dysfunction, creatinine ≥ 2.0mg/dL
  • Contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel or cilostazol
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).

Treatment and study plan

Xience V

Device

everolimus-eluting stent

Other names: Xience V stent

Cypher

Device

sirolimus-eluting stent

Other names: Cypher elect stent

Primary outcomes

  1. Angiographic in-segment late loss at angiography

    Time frame: 8-month

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause Death

    Time frame: 12 month

  2. All-cause Death

    Time frame: 5 year

  3. Cardiac death

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Cardiac death

    Time frame: 5 year

  5. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 5 year

  7. Target vessel revascularization (all and ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Target lesion revascularization (all and ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 5 year

  9. Stent thrombosis by definition of Academic Research Consortium (ARC)

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Stent thrombosis by definition of Academic Research Consortium (ARC)

    Time frame: 5 year

  11. Binary restenosis in both in-stent and in-segment

    Time frame: 8 months

  12. Angiographic pattern of restenosis

    Time frame: 8 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seung-Jung Park

Other

Collaborators

  • CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Comparison of Everolimus- Eluting Stent Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for De Novo Coronary Artery DisEase in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus

Acronym: ESSENCE-DM

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Oct 19, 2009
Registry last updated
Dec 13, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.