Zagreb University Hospital Eye Department
Zagreb, HR-10000, Croatia
NCT Number: NCT01496482
Purpose:
To establish whether there is a correlation between dry eye symptoms, age and gender, a difference in symptom intensity in different times of the day, which test (Schirmer or TBUT) better correlates with dry eye symptoms, whether it is possible to reliably use cheap, easy to use hygrometer in everyday clinical setting, and finally whether there is statistically significant correlation between applied tests (TBUT, Schirmer and evaporimetry).
Methods:
Subjects: 45 in group without dry eye related symptoms, and 45 in group with symptoms.
Examination included structured case history (questionnaire), slit lamp examination with fluorescein staining, periocular evaporimetry, TBUT test and Schirmer test.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–61 year
All sexes
Observational
Zagreb, HR-10000, Croatia
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to establish whether there is a correlation between dry eye symptoms, age and gender, any difference in symptom intensity in different times of the day, which test (Schirmer or TBUT) better correlates with dry eye symptoms, whether it is possible to reliably use cheap, easy to use hygrometer in everyday clinical setting, and, finally, whether there is statistically significant correlation between applied tests (TBUT, Schirmer and evaporimetry).
Methods:
Subjects were divided in two groups: 45 in group without dry eye related symptoms, and 45 in group with symptoms.
Examination was performed in the following sequence:
Case history consisted of the following questions:irritation more pronounced on wind? irritation during reading and/or watching TV or computer? irritation more pronounced during winter? gritty sensation in the eyes? irritation more pronounced in the morning or evening? All answers, except to the last question, were graded from 0 (no complaints) to 3 (severe).
Evaporimetry was performed using commercially available hygrometer from HYGROTEC (Titisee-Neustadt, Germany), installed in swimming goggles with its front part sawn off.
First measurement was performed by measuring for 5 minutes with eyes closed. Second measurement also lasted 5 minutes, with eyes kept open, normal blinking, and with subject fixating at one point in distance, with no eye movements.
Measured parameters included:
basal φ (%): relative environment humidity before measurement basal T: environment temperature before measurement closed eye φ (%): relative humidity in front of closed eye open eye φ (%): relative humidity in front of open eye C/O: ratio of φ (%) closed/open eye
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
As study compared specific diagnostic procedures, no intervention was done or compared.
Time frame: 10 minutes
Five minutes of tear evaporation measurement with eyes closed and five with open, normal blinking.
Time frame: 15 minutes (10 minutes tear evaporation, 5 minutes symptoms score recording)
Tear evaporation measurement compared to dry eye symptoms score (0-15 points).
Time frame: 15 minutes (10 minutes evaporation measurement, 5 minutes TBUT measurement)
Comparison of tear evaporation to Tear Film Break-up Time (seconds).
Time frame: 15 minutes (10 minutes tear evaporation measurement, 5 minutes Schirmer test)
Comparison of tear evaporation to Schirmer test (mm)
Time frame: 12 minutes (10 minutes tear evaporation measurements, 2 minutes corneal staining assessment)
Comparison of tear evaporation to corneal staining using fluorescein (score 1-3):
1:5-10 corneal stains at six o'clock; 2: 10-25 corneal stains; 3: more than 26 diffuse corneal stains
Time frame: 11 minutes (10 minutes evaporation measurement, 1 minute conjunctival hyperemia assessment)
Comparison of tear evaporation to conjunctival hyperemia (score 1-3):
1: minimal; 2: moderate; 3: severe
University of Zagreb
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05481450
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Lutz, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06483750
Cataract Senile, Dry Eye Disease
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07588074
Conjunctival Diseases, Conjunctivitis
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04730336
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Solihull, United Kingdom
View Trial Details