Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00322413

Comparison of Epoetin Alfa and Epoetin Omega in Anemic Dialysis Patients:Results of Efficacy Trial

The two epoetins, Epoetin alfa, a well established drug to treat renal anemia and Epoetin Omega, that differs from Epoetin alfa in the sugar moiety of the molecule were compared in regard of efficacy and safety to treat end stage renal disease anemia. Study hypothesis was that Epoetin Omega is non-inferior to Epoetin alfa in correcting renal anemia in dialysis patients. A 12-weeks randomized comparative efficacy study was performed including 77 end stage renal disease patients (epoetin omega:n=39, epoetin alfa: n=38). In the intent-to-treat analysis, average weekly difference in hemoglobin versus baseline value was higher in omega-treated patients: 1.94+-0.81 vs. 1.23+-0.62 g/dl. The unadjusted and adjusted omega-alfa differences were 0.71 g/dl (95%CI 0.38 to 1.04; p<0.001) and 0.78 g/dl (0.49 to 1.08;p<0.001), respectively. Average weekly epoetin dose was lower in the omega group: 87+-25 vs. 108+-21 IU/kg. The unadjusted and adjusted omega-alfa differences were -21IU/kg (-32 to -11; p<0.001) and -24IU/kg (-35 to -13; p<0.001), respectively. Epoetins were comparably well tolerated. In dialysis patients, subcutaneous epoetin omega apparently provides a greater anti-anemic effect per administered dose (IU) than epoetin alfa.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The two epoetins, Epoetin alfa, a well established drug to treat renal anemia and Epoetin Omega, that differs from Epoetin alfa in the sugar moiety of the molecule were compared in regard of efficacy and safety to treat end stage renal disease anemia. Study hypothesis was that Epoetin Omega is non-inferior to Epoetin alfa in correcting renal anemia in dialysis patients. A 12-weeks randomized comparative efficacy study was performed including 77 end stage renal disease patients (epoetin omega:n=39, epoetin alfa: n=38). All patients were anemic (Hemoglobin < 90 g/L), treated by regular hemodialysis and without signs of bleeding, hemolysis, inflammation or history of major surgery.Treatment was started with 50 IU/kg body weight subcutaneously per week and thereafter adjusted according to the hemoglobin response. In the intent-to-treat analysis, average weekly difference in hemoglobin versus baseline value was higher in omega-treated patients: 1.94+-0.81 vs. 1.23+-0.62 g/dl. The unadjusted and adjusted omega-alfa differences were 0.71 g/dl (95%CI 0.38 to 1.04; p<0.001) and 0.78 g/dl (0.49 to 1.08;p<0.001), respectively. Average weekly epoetin dose was lower in the omega group: 87+-25 vs. 108+-21 IU/kg. The unadjusted and adjusted omega-alfa differences were -21IU/kg (-32 to -11; p<0.001) and -24IU/kg (-35 to -13; p<0.001), respectively. Epoetins were comparably well tolerated. In dialysis patients, subcutaneous epoetin omega apparently provides a greater anti-anemic effect per administered dose (IU) than epoetin alfa.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • End stage renal disease
  • Regular dialysis treatment
  • Renal anemia (hemoglobin<9.0 g/dl)
  • Age > 18 years
  • Adequate iron stores (TIBC saturation > 20%, ferritin >200)

Exclusion criteria

  • Signs of bleeding
  • Major surgery in previous 60 days
  • Hemolysis
  • Other causes of anemia
  • Cancer
  • Inflammatory diseases

Treatment and study plan

Epoetin

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin level

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average weekly epoetin dose

  2. Time to achieve hemoglobin level of 10 g/dl

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

General Hospital Sveti Duh

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Safety of Epoetin Omega in Patients Undergoing Regular Dialysis. Part II: Comparative Trial Versus Epoetin Alfa

Important dates

Study start
1997
Study completion
1997
First posted
May 5, 2006
Registry last updated
Jul 21, 2006

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.