Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05345691

Comparison of Efficacy, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-arm, Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy, PK (Pharmacokinetic), PD (Pharmacodynamic), safety, and immunogenicity of Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

55 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

PPD Global Ltd, Granta Park, Great Abington,

Cambridge, UK, CB21 6GQ, United Kingdom

About this study

The study will consist of 3 study periods: Screening period; Part 1, double-blind active-controlled period; and Part 2, transition period. In the double-blind active-controlled period, eligible Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1000 or Prolia®. Prior to dosing At Week 52, patients in Prolia® treatment group will be randomized again in a 1:1 ratio to either continue on Prolia® or be transitioned to Bmab 1000. To maintain the study blinding, the patients in the original Bmab 1000 arm will also go through the re-randomization procedure; however, they will continue to receive Bmab 1000. The interventions (Bmab 1000 or Prolia®) will be administered subcutaneously every 6 months. End-of-study visit will be at Week 78 post randomization (Month 18).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Postmenopausal women, aged ≥55 and <80 years at screening. Postmenopausal is defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone) levels ≥40 mIU/mL at screening or 6 weeks postsurgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy.
  • Evidence of osteoporosis as assessed by lumbar spine (L1-L4) absolute BMD corresponding to a T-score classification ≤-2.5 and ≥-4.0.
  • At least 3 vertebrae in the L1-L4 region and at least one hip joint are evaluable by DXA at screening.
  • Patients with body weight ≥50 to <90 kg at screening.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with T-score of <-4.0 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck.
  • Known history of previous exposure to denosumab (Prolia®, Xgeva®, or any biosimilar denosumab).
  • For prior or ongoing use of any osteoporosis treatment (other than calcium and vitamin D supplements) following points to be considered for the washout periods prior to the screening visit:

a. Oral bisphosphonate i. Ineligible if used for 3 or more years cumulatively ii. If used for <3 years, a gap of at least 1 year since the last dose is required at the screening visit b. Dose received any time

  • Systemic glucocorticosteroids
  • Patients with ongoing serious infections
  • Evidence of any of the following per the patient's history, DXA, or X-ray review and/or current disease:
  • Patient in bed rest for 2 or more weeks during the last 3 months prior to screening
  • Current hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism
  • History and/or current hyperparathyroidism or hypoparathyroidism
  • Current hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia based on albumin-adjusted serum calcium
  • Any bone disease including bone metastasis or metabolic disease (except for osteoporosis), eg, osteomalacia or osteogenesis imperfecta, rheumatoid arthritis, Paget's disease, ALP (alkaline phosphatase) elevation (at investigator's discretion), Cushing's disease, clinically significant hyperprolactinemia (at investigator's discretion), fibrous dysplasia, malabsorption syndrome which may interfere with the interpretation of the results
  • History and/or presence of one severe or 3 or more moderate vertebral fractures
  • History and/or presence of hip fracture or bilateral hip replacement
  • Presence of an active healing fracture according to assessment of investigator
  • History of severe skeletal pain with bisphosphonates which, as per the investigator, is a risk to her participation in the trial
  • Oral/dental or periodontal conditions:

Treatment and study plan

Bmab 1000

Biological

60 mg administered as a single SC (subcutaneous) injection once every 6 months.

Prolia®

Biological

60 mg administered as a single SC injection once every 6 months

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine BMD (Bone Mineral Density)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

    To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD

Secondary outcomes

  1. AUEC (Area Under the Effect Curve) of the Bone Resorption Marker sCTX (Serum C-terminal Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 26

    To demonstrate pharmacodynamic equivalence between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on AUEC of the bone resorption marker sCTX from baseline to week 26

  2. Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine BMD

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

    To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD

  3. Percentage Change in Total Hip BMD by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry)

    Time frame: Baseline upto week 26

    To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline, at Week 26 and Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD

  4. Serum Concentrations of P1NP (Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52

    To compare bone turnover between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on P1NP after the first dose

  5. Incidence of TEAEs (Treatment-emergent Adverse Events) up to 6 Months After the Second Dose

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 78

    To compare safety and tolerability of 2 administrations of Bmab 1000 and Prolia® 6 months apart

  6. Incidence of ADA (Anti-drug Antibody)

    Time frame: Week 78 (Transition Period)

    To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®

  7. Incidence of ADA (Anti-drug Antibody)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52 (Double-blind Active-controlled Period)

    To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®

  8. Incidence of NAb (Neutralizing Antibody) up to Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52 (Double-blind Active-controlled Period)

    To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®

  9. Percentage Change in Total Hip BMD by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry)

    Time frame: Week 52

    To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline, at Week 26 and Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD

  10. Incidence of NAb (Neutralizing Antibody) up to Week 52

    Time frame: Week 78 (Transition Period)

    To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®

  11. Percentage Change From Baseline in Hip BMD

    Time frame: Week 78

    To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 78 in Hip BMD

  12. Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral BMD

    Time frame: Week 78

    To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 78 in Femoral BMD

  13. Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of sCTX

    Time frame: baseline to Week 26

    To compare minimum Concentration (Cmin) of sCTX between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®

  14. Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 26

    Time frame: Weeks 26

    Serum Concentrations of Denosumab

  15. Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 52

    Time frame: Weeks 52

    Serum Concentrations of Denosumab

  16. Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 78

    Time frame: Weeks 78

    Serum Concentrations of Denosumab

  17. Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral BMD

    Time frame: Week 52

    To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 52 in Femoral BMD

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Biocon Biologics UK Ltd

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Parallel-Arm Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Acronym: DEVOTE

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Apr 26, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 9, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.