PPD Global Ltd, Granta Park, Great Abington,
Cambridge, UK, CB21 6GQ, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT05345691
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-arm, Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy, PK (Pharmacokinetic), PD (Pharmacodynamic), safety, and immunogenicity of Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me55 year–80 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
Cambridge, UK, CB21 6GQ, United Kingdom
The study will consist of 3 study periods: Screening period; Part 1, double-blind active-controlled period; and Part 2, transition period. In the double-blind active-controlled period, eligible Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1000 or Prolia®. Prior to dosing At Week 52, patients in Prolia® treatment group will be randomized again in a 1:1 ratio to either continue on Prolia® or be transitioned to Bmab 1000. To maintain the study blinding, the patients in the original Bmab 1000 arm will also go through the re-randomization procedure; however, they will continue to receive Bmab 1000. The interventions (Bmab 1000 or Prolia®) will be administered subcutaneously every 6 months. End-of-study visit will be at Week 78 post randomization (Month 18).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
a. Oral bisphosphonate i. Ineligible if used for 3 or more years cumulatively ii. If used for <3 years, a gap of at least 1 year since the last dose is required at the screening visit b. Dose received any time
60 mg administered as a single SC (subcutaneous) injection once every 6 months.
60 mg administered as a single SC injection once every 6 months
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD
Time frame: Baseline to Week 26
To demonstrate pharmacodynamic equivalence between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on AUEC of the bone resorption marker sCTX from baseline to week 26
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD
Time frame: Baseline upto week 26
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline, at Week 26 and Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
To compare bone turnover between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on P1NP after the first dose
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 78
To compare safety and tolerability of 2 administrations of Bmab 1000 and Prolia® 6 months apart
Time frame: Week 78 (Transition Period)
To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52 (Double-blind Active-controlled Period)
To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52 (Double-blind Active-controlled Period)
To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®
Time frame: Week 52
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline, at Week 26 and Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD
Time frame: Week 78 (Transition Period)
To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®
Time frame: Week 78
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 78 in Hip BMD
Time frame: Week 78
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 78 in Femoral BMD
Time frame: baseline to Week 26
To compare minimum Concentration (Cmin) of sCTX between Bmab 1000 and Prolia®
Time frame: Weeks 26
Serum Concentrations of Denosumab
Time frame: Weeks 52
Serum Concentrations of Denosumab
Time frame: Weeks 78
Serum Concentrations of Denosumab
Time frame: Week 52
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 52 in Femoral BMD
Biocon Biologics UK Ltd
Industry
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Parallel-Arm Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Acronym: DEVOTE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07028320
Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Shanghai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05338086
Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Sofia, Sofia-Grad, Bulgaria
View Trial DetailsNCT01631214
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04757376
Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Tallinn, Harju, Estonia
View Trial Details