Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06818565

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime Avibactam Versus Extended Infusions of High Dose Meropenem in Patients of ACLF With Nosocomial Infections.

Acute on chronic liver failure patients are at high risk for nosocomial infections due to liver dysfunction, which impairs immune responses and increases vulnerability to infections. Key factors contributing to nosocomial infections in ACLF patients include ascites, use of invasive devices, and recent hospitalization, frequent need for broad spectrum antibiotics. Multidrug resistance is a growing issue, making treatment more challenging, common pathogens involved are gram negative bacteria such as Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Surveillance data show increasing carbapenem resistant enterobacterales (CRE) infection rates in cirrhotics, with high morbidity and mortality rates. The impact of these nosocomial infections is profound, significantly worsen outcomes in ACLF patients, leading to prolonged hospitalizations, increased health care costs and higher mortality rates. Early detection and effective antibiotic stewardship are essential to manage antibiotic resistance and improve patient outcomes. In this study we aim to compare efficacy and safety of Ceftazidime avibactam versus extended infusions of high dose Meropenem in patients of ACLF with nosocomial infections.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences (ILBS)

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070, India

Location contact

Dr Amanjot Kaur, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

01146300000

About this study

Hypothesis - We hypothesize that ceftazidime-avibactum would be superior and an effective carbapenem sparing agent compared to extended high dose carbapenems as empirical therapy in management of nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organisms in patients with ACLF.

Aim -To compare the efficacy and safety of Ceftazidime avibactam and extended infusions of high dose Meropenem as emperical antibiotic in patients of ACLF with nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organisms.

Primary objective:

  • To compare the efficacy of Ceftazidime avibactam over extended infusions of high dose carabapenem as emperical antibiotic in achieving clinical response at day 3 in patients of ACLF with suspected nosocomial infections.

Secondary objectives:

  • To study the spectrum of nosocomial infections, bacterial DNA and resistance genes in the context of nosocomial infections in ACLF
  • Proportion of patients requiring escalation/de-escalation of antibiotics at day 3
  • Incidence of clinical and microbiologic response at day 5 and day 7
  • Time to escalation of antibiotics in both groups
  • Transfer to icu, mortality, and progression of organ failures and worsening of AARC scores by grade I, SOFA score by point 2.
  • Microbiologic outcome (Eradication/Persistence)
  • To identify biomarkers of host response to empirical antibiotic regimen
  • Transplant free survival at day 15 and day 28
  • Proportion of patients made eligible for transplant day 7. A prospective, Randomized Control Trial. Single centre, Open label, Block randomization will be done, it will be implemented by IWRS method. This study will be conducted in Department of Hepatology, ILBS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • ACLF as per APASL criteria
  • ACLF patients with nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organism (defined as suspected or documented evidence of infection after 48 hours of hospitalization) requiring antibiotics.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe septic shock with MOF requiring escalation of antibiotics
  • Patients having known allergies to meropenem or Ceftazidime Avibactam
  • Culture sensitivity showing isolate non susceptible to study drug being investigated.
  • Already on either regimen, receiving meropenem or Ceftazidime Avibactam >48 hours.
  • On mechanical ventilator support PF ratio < 300.
  • Patients on immunosuppression medication
  • HCC or other malignancies
  • CKD
  • CAD
  • Pregnancy or Lactation
  • Post Liver Transplantation
  • Refusal to consent
  • PLWHA

Treatment and study plan

Meropenem Injection

Drug

Meropenem 2 gm iv TDS

Ceftazidime-avibactam

Drug

Ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 gm iv TDS

Teicoplanin

Drug

Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD 3 doses followed by 400mg iv OD

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of ACLF patients with nosocomial infection by carbapenem resistant organisms showing clinical response at the end of treatment.

    Time frame: Day 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to escalation or descalation of antibiotics

    Time frame: within 3 days

  2. Progression in terms of organ dysfunction/failure at day 5 and 7.

    Time frame: day 5 and 7

  3. Incidence of adverse events in both groups.

    Time frame: within 7 to 10 days

  4. Duration of hospital and ICU stay

    Time frame: day 28

  5. Mortality at day 15 and day 28

    Time frame: day 15 & 28

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Dr Amanjot Kaur, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

01146300000

Prof. Rakhi Maiwall, DM

CONTACT

[email protected]

01146300000

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 10, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 10, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.