Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06714305

Comparison of Effectiveness of Hand Versus Rotary Instrumentation in Pulpectomy of Primary Second Molar Teeth.

To provide an effective technique for pulpectomy in primary second molar teeth in pakistani population, local studies are required. No local studies have been done so far and limited number of international in vivo studies have been conducted previously. Hence this study will evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in pakistani population. If results of this study will be significant in favor of this technique, it will be applied with confidence in same population. There will be better compliance of patients as procedure will be done in single visit.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

6 year–11 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Nishter Institute of Dentistry

Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children of both genders having age 4-6.5 years
  • Children having signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis in their second primary molar teeth on clinical examination as per operational definition.

Exclusion criteria

  • Children having previously accessed pulpectomy assessed clinically and on periapical radiographs.
  • Children having acute/chronic abcesses in teeth under consideration seen clinically.
  • Children having furcal or periapical radiolucency around teeth under consideration seen on periapical radiograph.
  • Diabetic, haemophilic or medically compromised children found on history
  • Children who fail to attend appointments.

Treatment and study plan

Group B will be assigned to rotary instrumentation.

Device

group B, NiTi rotary protaper system will be used for canal preparation by crown down technique.

will be assigned to rotary instrumentation.

Device

the canal will be prepared by conventional hedstorm files manually by step back technique.

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare the effectiveness of manual versus rotary instrumentation for pulpectomy in primary second molar teeth irreversible pulpitis

    Time frame: immediately after obturation

    Effectiveness of instruments will be determined by analyzing the adequacy of root canal filling. Adequacy will be checked immediately after root canal filling on periapical radiographs by measuring with scale the distance of root canal filling from apex to length of filling material in both mesial and distal roots. If distance is less than 2.5 mm, it will be called as effective.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

RANA AHMAD

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Dec 3, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.