Al-zahra university hospital
Isfahan, 70007, Iran
NCT Number: NCT01109901
The purpose of this study is to determine which surgical method is better for cubital tunnel syndrome in outcomes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Isfahan, 70007, Iran
Compression of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel is the most common cause of numbness on the ulnar side of the hand. We aimed to compare patient outcomes included pain, sensation, muscle strength and muscle atrophy in two methods of surgery contain Anterior Sub Cutaneous Transposition (ASCT) and Anterior Sub Muscular Transposition (ASMT) of the ulnar nerve in Cubital tunnel syndrome.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
transposition of ulnar nerve into subcutaneous bed
Other names: ASCT
transposition of ulnar nerve into muscular tissue
Other names: ASMT
Time frame: at 6 months post-operatively
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with scores of zero to ten (0 for no pain and 10 intolerable pain) then scored as follows: 0, Sever (8-10); 1, Slight (4-7); 2, none (0-3)
Time frame: at 6 months post-operatively
Sensory disturbance were tested with Semmes-Weinstein filaments and sensory deficits were categorized according to the Yale sensory scale. According to standard scoring system that designed, the severity of sensation and function of the ulnar nerve was scored as follows: 0, Abscent sensation; 1, Decrease or abnormal sensation; 2, Intact sensation.
Time frame: at 6 months post-operatively
Muscle strength was evaluated with the grading system from the Medical Research Council which is based upon a scale of zero to five: 0, No muscle contraction; 1,Flicker or trace of muscle contraction; 2,Limb or joint movement possible only with gravity eliminated; 3,Limb or joint movement against gravity only; 4,Power decreased but limb or joint movement possible against resistance; 5,Normal power against resistance. Then results were scored as follows: 0,Poor (0-1); 1,Moderate (2-3); 2,Good (4-5)
Time frame: at 6 months post-operatively
Muscle atrophy was scored with one orthopedic surgeon as follows: 0, sever; 1, moderate; 2, none
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Other
Study of Surgical Methods for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04322448
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, Cumulative Trauma Disorders
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03651609
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, Cumulative Trauma Disorders
Ljubljana, Slovenia
View Trial DetailsNCT05212311
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, Cumulative Trauma Disorders
Al Ḩayy Ath Thāmin, Giza Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03629470
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, Cumulative Trauma Disorders
New York, United States
View Trial Details