Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07079163

Comparison of Conventional and 3D-printed Surgical Obturators for Maxillary Defects

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications associated with three types of immediate surgical obturators used in maxillectomy patients. A total of 24 patients with acquired maxillary defects will be randomly assigned to receive one of three obturator designs: (1) conventional obturators retained with clasps and wire, (2) resin 3D-printed obturators with printed clasps and palatal screws, or (3) metallic 3D-printed obturators with metal clasps and palatal screws.

Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS), and postoperative complications such as discomfort, lack of retention, or mucosal irritation . The study seeks to determine whether digital fabrication and enhanced retention methods improve clinical outcomes compared to traditional approaches

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

36 year–68 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Maxillofacial Prosthodontic Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University

Al Mansurah, 35511, Egypt

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Alaa Zaki

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Khaled Zahran, Phd

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201002706780

About this study

Maxillary defects resulting from maxillectomy procedures lead to significant impairments in speech, mastication, swallowing, and quality of life. Rehabilitation typically involves either surgical reconstruction or the use of a prosthetic obturator. Immediate surgical obturators (ISOs) are commonly used during or immediately after surgery to seal the oronasal communication and support healing. However, conventional obturators are often bulky, manually fabricated, and prone to poor retention due to tissue changes during early healing, leading to reduced patient satisfaction and increased complications.

Recent advancements in digital technology, including intraoral scanning and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), allow for the precise design and 3D printing of obturators customized to the anticipated defect. Enhanced retention strategies such as palatal screws and custom clasps may offer improved stability, function, and comfort compared to conventional designs.

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of three types of immediate surgical obturators in patients undergoing maxillectomy. A total of 24 patients with acquired maxillary defects and sufficient remaining dentition will be randomly assigned to one of three groups:

Group I: Conventional obturators retained with clasps and wire

Group II: Resin 3D-printed obturators with printed clasps and palatal screws

Group III: Metallic 3D-printed obturators with metal clasps and palatal screws

The study's primary outcome is patient satisfaction, assessed using the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS), which evaluates prosthesis-related comfort, appearance, speech, and function. Secondary outcomes include postoperative prosthetic complications such as pain, ulceration, poor fit, or dislodgement. Assessments will be conducted during the standard healing period.

This study will provide valuable insights into the impact of digital workflows and retention techniques on the functional performance and patient-centered outcomes of obturator prostheses following maxillectomy. Ethical approval has been obtained, and all participants will provide informed consent prior to inclusion.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients indicated for maxillectomy with the remaining number of teeth
  • Referral to Maxillofacial Prosthodontic Unit, Mansoura University

Exclusion criteria

  • contraindication to surgery (not physically fit to underwent surgery)

Treatment and study plan

Obturator block

Device

A manually fabricated obturator using a preoperative maxillary cast, retained with clasps and wire. Delivered immediately after maxillectomy.

Other names: Conventional Immediate Obturator Group

Primary outcomes

  1. patient satisfaction

    Time frame: 2-3 weeks after surgery

    Patient satisfaction: measured by Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS) over 2-3 weeks.The Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS) is a patient-reported outcome measure developed to assess the functional performance and satisfaction with an obturator prosthesis, particularly in maxillectomy patients. It evaluates multiple domains related to oral rehabilitation.The OFS typically includes items addressing the following:

    Appearance (Esthetics)

    Speech Intelligibility

    Swallowing (Deglutition)

    Chewing/Mastication

    Comfort

    Retention and Stability

    Overall Satisfaction 5-point Likert scale (e.g., 1 = very poor, 5 = excellent

Secondary outcomes

  1. complications

    Time frame: 2-3 weeks after surgery

    Postoperative complications: type and frequency (pain, discomfort, dislodgement, etc.)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Alaa Zaki

CONTACT

+201069703419

Fatma F Mahanaa, phD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201006863040

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fatma mahanna

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Prosthetic Complications Between Conventional Immediate Surgical Obturators and 3D-printed Immediate Surgical Obturators With Enhanced Retention

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 22, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.