Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06211452

Comparison of Consolidation Strategies for Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

GATLA 8-AML´07 trial is an multicenter phase III dose-optimization trial for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemias in children and adolescents. Patients are treated with a combination of intensive chemotherapy in combination with intrathecal-injection by CNS and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The patients are stratified in a standard-group (SR) and a high risk-group (HR). SR was defined as FAB (French-American-British) M1/M2 with Auer rods; FAB M4eo or favorable cytogenetics [t(8;21)/AML1-ETO or inv(16) or t(16;16) and/or CBFB/MYH11)]; bone marrow blasts ≤5% on day 15. HR was defined as all others. SR patients were reclassified to the HR group if FLT3-ITD positive.

Based on the experience of the BFM group, it was decided to randomly evaluate whether the six-drug conventional consolidation stage can be replaced with the use of a consolidation based by block therapy on drugs of proven efficacy in AML with the aim of reducing residual disease, and the toxicity of this stage. Patients are randomized once the double induction is completed into those who will receive the conventional consolidation phase and those who will receive consolidation with the combination of high doses cytarabine and two different anthracyclines sequentially.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

AML Pediatric AML

Age range

Up to 18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

About this study

All patients in the trial, whether standard risk (SR) or high risk (HR), receive 2 Induction courses: AIE and HAM and then are randomized to continue with the consolidation phase: a conventional consolidation (Arm A) with 6 drugs vs 2 blocks of chemotherapy that are incorporated in this protocol (AI and haM) (Arm B) and then an Intensification phase with high doses of cytarabine and etoposide. The difference between the SR and AR groups is that the former don't continue with the maintenance phase, while those in HR receive 1 year of Maintenance if they don't have a histoidentical family donor. SR patients according to cytogenetics and with < 5% blasts in the bone marrow on day 15, haven´t indication for TCHP in 1st CR. HR patients, with a histoidentical family donor, will be transplanted in the 1st. CR after the Consolidation phases or the AI and haM blocks, according to the treatment arm that corresponded to them by randomization

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • De novo AML
  • FAB M0-M7
  • Primary myelosarcomas or acute mixed lineage leukemia / biphenotypic leukemia (predominantly myeloid).
  • Written informed consent from patients, parents, or guardians was obtained at study entry in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki

Exclusion criteria

  • AML as secondary malignancy
  • Children with Down's syndrome
  • Accompanying diseases which do not allow therapy according to the protocol
  • Pre-treatment for more than 14 days with another intensive induction therapy
  • Patients with APL
  • Patients with myelodysplasia
  • Patients with blast crisis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
  • Patients who die before starting treatment

Treatment and study plan

ARM A: Active Comparator Drug

Drug

Consolidation 6-thioguanine 60 mg/m2/d, 1 to 43 po; prednisone 40 mg/m2/d, on days 1-28 orally; vincristine 1.5 mg/m2/d, days 1, 8, 15, 22; idarubicin 7 mg/m2/d, on days 1, 8, 15, 22; cytarabine 75 mg/m2/d, on days 3-6, 10-13, 17-20, 24-27, 31-34, 38-41; intrathecal cytarabine on days 1, 15, 29, 43; cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/d, days 29, 43.

ARM B: Blocks Therapy Drug

Drug

Blocks AI Cytarabine 500 mg/m2 as 24 infusion infusion x 4 d; Idarubicin 7 mg/m2 on days 3 and 5; Intrathecal cytarabine on days 0 and 6.

haM Cytarabine 1 g/m2 every 12 hours for 3 days; Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 days 4 and 5; Intrathecal cytarabine days 6 and 15.

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine if two-cycle consolidation reduced the cumulative incidence of relapse compared to conventional consolidation (CONS) among newly diagnosed pediatric patients with AML.

    Time frame: 72 months

    The GATLA 8-LMA-P'07 was a randomized trial including pediatric AML children in Argentina; the design was based on AML-BFM 98 with minor modifications.(10) Similar to AML-BFM 98, the trial compared two approaches to consolidation. The standard regimen was a 6-week consolidation phase (CONS), which was also used in AML-BFM 93 vs. the comparator regimen of two short chemotherapy cycles (two-cycle) with cytarabine plus idarubicin (AI) and high dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone (haM). AML-BFM 98 previously demonstrated that haM was tolerable.10 We hypothesized that the two-cycle consolidation (two-cycle) would be associated with lower relapse rates related to dose intensification compared to the standard CONS approach.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate Event-free survival (EFS) of pediatric patients with AML.

    Time frame: 72 months

    EFS was calculated from date of randomization to first event (death, resistant leukemia, relapse or secondary malignancy) or date of last follow-up.

  2. Evaluate Overall Survival (OS) of pediatric patients with AML.

    Time frame: 72 months

    OS was also calculated from date of randomization to date of death or date of last follow-up.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Grupo Argentino de Tratamiento de la Leucemia Aguda

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Consolidation Strategies for Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia - Results of the Randomized GATLA 8-LMA-P'07 Trial

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jan 18, 2024
Registry last updated
Jan 18, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.