The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
NCT Number: NCT06038552
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the overall survival benefits of local treatment combined with imatinib(IM) and IM alone in patients suffering from GIST liver metastases. The main question it aims to answer is:
• Whether IM combined with hepatic resection (HR) or other local treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has better long-term survival benefits compared to IM monotherapy.
Patients are divided into different treatment groups:
* IM group * IM combined with HR group * IM combined with RFA or TACE group
Researchers will compare the IM + HR group and IM + RFA/TACE group with the IM group to see if it has a better Overall survival (OS).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Observational
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent the most prevalent type of mesenchymal tumor within the gastrointestinal tract, and the liver is the most common site of metastasis from GIST. Imatinib (IM) has significantly enhanced clinical outcomes for patients with advanced disease. Since its approval in February 2002 for treating metastatic or unresectable GISTs, 38% of patients have shown a partial response, while 13.6% have experienced disease progression within 1 to 3 months of IM administration. Over half of the patients with metastases experienced disease progression within two years of IM treatment, attributed to secondary drug resistance. Few studies are comparing the survival benefits of different surgical modalities. The investigators aimed to evaluate IM combined with hepatic resection (HR) or other local treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), compared to IM monotherapy in long-term survival benefits in patients suffering from GIST liver metastases.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients with GIST liver metastases were administered an initial IM dose of 400 mg daily, while those with KIT exon 9 mutations received 600-800 mg daily. All patients continued IM indefinitely unless progression or intolerable adverse reactions.
Other names: Gleevec
HR The determination of the surgical modality was established subsequent to comprehensive consultations tailored to each patient within the Department of Liver Surgery. The surgical strategy was established in consideration of factors such as the residual liver volume, tumour positioning, and the surgeon's personal preference. Employing an intraoperative ultrasonographic to enhance the precision of operative assessment.
RFA RFA was executed utilizing the commercially accessible Cool-tip™ RFA system or the RF 2000 system. The electrode was percutaneously inserted through a guide needle under real-time ultrasound guidance.The primary objective of the RFA procedures encompassed the complete elimination of the tumour entity, with a prescribed ablative margin of 0.5 cm meticulously factored in.
TACE Under a comprehensive assessment of the hepatic arterial blood supply, a selective catheter was introduced into the segmental or subsegmental arteries that supplied the tumour. The regimen of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy included infusion of carboplatin 300 mg, a mixture of 50 mg of epirubicin and 8 mg of mitomycin C, intimately blended with 5 mL of lipiodol. Embolization was finally performed with either absorbable gelatin sponge particles or polyvinyl alcohol particles .
Time frame: up to 200 months
Overall survival (OS) was the span between GIST liver metastases diagnosis and the date of death.
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Other
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Liver Resection, Radiofrequency Ablation, Transarterial Chemoembolization, and Drug Therapy in Patients with Liver Metastasis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04476082
Bile Duct Cancer, Bile Duct Diseases
Greifswald, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03556384
Brain Diseases, Cancer
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00756509
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Helsinki, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT01742299
Bone Marrow Diseases, Chronic Disease
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details