Al-Azhar University
Cairo, Egypt, 11865
NCT Number: NCT07327866
Given the clinical importance of maternal hypotension, the potential advantages of sequential spinal dosing warrant formal evaluation in a prospective, adequately powered randomized controlled trial. We therefore designed this study to compare the incidence of post-spinal hypotension between the classic single-shot spinal and the sequential fractionated spinal techniques in elective cesarean delivery.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–45 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
Cairo, Egypt, 11865
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In the classic group, patients will receive a total intrathecal dose of 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (2.5 mL) combined with fentanyl 20 µg, administered as a single injection. Immediately after completion of the injection, the patient will be positioned supine with a 15° left lateral tilt to minimize aortocaval compression and facilitate uniform spread of the anesthetic solution.
In the sequential (fractionated) group, patients will receive the intrathecal dose in two fractions. While in the sitting position, the first fraction consisting of 7.5 mg (1.5 mL) of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% combined with fentanyl 15 µg will be administered. After waiting for 60 seconds, the remaining 5 mg (1 mL) of hyperbaric bupivacaine and an additional 5 µg of fentanyl will be injected, either through the same intrathecal needle (if kept in place) or following careful reinsertion according to institutional practice. Immediately after completing the injection, the patient will be positioned supine with a 15° left lateral tilt to optimize maternal hemodynamics and ensure even distribution of the anesthetic solution.
Time frame: Assessed during the first 15 minutes after the intrathecal injection.
Occurrence of maternal hypotension within 15 minutes after intrathecal injection, defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) decrease greater than 20% from baseline or an absolute SBP below 90 mmHg. This outcome directly measures the hemodynamic stability achieved by each spinal technique.
Time frame: Measured continuously for 15 minutes following the intrathecal injection.
The interval between the time of intrathecal injection and the first recorded episode of hypotension. This reflects how long each technique maintains stable blood pressure before any drop occurs.
Time frame: Assessed within 15 minutes after intrathecal injection.
The total count of discrete hypotensive events occurring within the observation period after spinal anesthesia. This indicates the frequency and severity of blood pressure fluctuations.
Time frame: Assessed within 15 minutes after spinal administration.
The total amount of phenylephrine and/or ephedrine administered to correct hypotension during the observation period, serving as an indirect measure of hemodynamic stability.
Time frame: Evaluated from injection until block stabilization within 20 minutes.
Determines the highest dermatomal sensory level achieved and the time required to reach the T4 level, indicating block quality and onset characteristics of the anesthetic technique. Maximal sensory block level is assessed by testing loss of sensation to cold or pinprick over the trunk in a cephalad-caudal direction and mapping the highest blocked dermatome (e.g., using an alcohol swab or pin along the midline and comparing to known dermatomal levels such as T4 at the nipple line). Time to T4 is measured as the interval in minutes from completion of intrathecal injection to the first assessment at which loss of sensation reaches the T4 dermatome, documented with the same stimulus and dermatomal map.
Time frame: Monitored intraoperatively up to delivery.
Incidence of intraoperative nausea or vomiting related to hypotension or anesthetic effect.
Time frame: Assessed after delivery before discharge from recovery.
Maternal satisfaction will be evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale addressing analgesia adequacy, comfort, and overall anesthesia experience. Each participant will rate her satisfaction as follows: 1 for "very dissatisfied," indicating poor pain control and significant discomfort; 2 for "dissatisfied," reflecting partial relief with ongoing discomfort; 3 for "neutral," denoting acceptable but unremarkable pain relief; 4 for "satisfied," representing good pain control with minimal discomfort; and 5 for "very satisfied," indicating excellent analgesia and a fully positive anesthesia experience.
Time frame: Determined immediately after delivery (Apgar at 1 and 5 minutes; pH from cord sample at birth).
Measures neonatal wellbeing through 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores and umbilical artery blood pH to assess the effect of maternal hemodynamics on fetal oxygenation.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Al-Azhar University
Other
Incidence of Post-Spinal Anaesthesia Hypotension in Caesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial of Classic Versus Sequential Spinal Technique
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07407530
Caesarean Delivery, Gastric Emptying
Dublin, Ireland/County Dublin, Ireland
View Trial DetailsNCT01542346
Caesarean Delivery
Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT07500519
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypotension
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06952907
Arterial Pressure, Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Besançon, France
View Trial Details