Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01515228

Comparison of Cilotax Stent and Everolimus -Eluting Stent With Diabetes Mellitus (ESSENCE-DM III)

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and effectiveness of coronary stenting with the Cilotax stent compared to the Xience Prime stent in the treatment of diabetic patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–74 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Cheonan, Cheonan, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Prospective, randomized multi-center trial of 300 patients will be enrolled at 7 centers in Korea. Following angiography, diabetic patients with significant diameter stenosis >50% by visual estimation have documented myocardial ischemia or symptoms of angina, and eligible for stenting without any exclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to: a) Cilotax stent vs. b) Xience Prime stent. All patients will be followed for at least 1 year. Angiographic follow-up at 9-months is routinely recommended.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Clinical:

  • Diabetic patients with active treatment (oral agent or insulin)
  • Patients with angina and documented ischemia or patients with documented silent ischemia
  • Patients who are eligible for intracoronary stenting
  • Age > 20 years, < 75 years

Angiographic:

  • De novo lesion
  • Percent diameter stenosis ≥ 50%
  • Reference vessel size ≥ 2.5 mm by visual estimation

Exclusion criteria

  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  • Pregnant state
  • Known hypersensitivity or contra-indication to contrast agent and heparin
  • Limited life-expectancy (less than 1 year)
  • ST-elevation acute myocardial infraction requiring primary stenting
  • Characteristics of lesion: left main disease, in-stent restenosis, graft vessels
  • Hematological disease (Neutropenia < 3000/mm3), Thrombocytopenia < 100,000/mm3)
  • Hepatic dysfunction, liver enzyme (ALT and AST) elevation ≥ 3times normal
  • Renal dysfunction, creatinine ≥ 2.0mg/dL
  • Contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel or cilostazol
  • Contraindication to Paclitaxel or everolimus
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 30%
  • Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy < 1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment for example: oxygen dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, active hepatitis or severe liver function or kidney disease)

Treatment and study plan

Xience Prime

Device

everolimus-eluting stent implantation

Other names: everolimus-eluting stent

Cilotax stent

Device

paclitaxel with cilostazol dual drug eluting stent implantation

Other names: paclitaxel with cilostazol dual drug eluting stent

Primary outcomes

  1. In-segment late luminal loss

    Time frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. All Death

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Cardiac death

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Target vessel revascularization (ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Target lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Stent thrombosis (by ARC definition)

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Binary restenosis in both in-stent and in-segment

    Time frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up

  8. Angiographic pattern of restenosis

    Time frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up

  9. Procedural success

    Time frame: At discharge from the index hospitalization, an expected average of 3 days.

    achievement of a final diameter stenosis of <30% by QCA using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, Q wave MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay

  10. All Death

    Time frame: 1 month

  11. All Death

    Time frame: 4 months

  12. All Death

    Time frame: 9 months

  13. Cardiac death

    Time frame: 1 month

  14. Cardiac death

    Time frame: 4 months

  15. Cardiac death

    Time frame: 9 months

  16. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 1 month

  17. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 4 months

  18. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 9 months

  19. Target vessel revascularization (ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 1 month

  20. Target vessel revascularization (ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 4 months

  21. Target vessel revascularization (ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 9 months

  22. Target lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 1 month

  23. Target lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 4 months

  24. Target lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: 9 months

  25. Stent thrombosis (by ARC definition)

    Time frame: 1 month

  26. Stent thrombosis (by ARC definition)

    Time frame: 4 months

  27. Stent thrombosis (by ARC definition)

    Time frame: 9 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

CHEOL WHAN LEE, MD, PhD.

Other

Collaborators

  • CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Comparison of Dual Drug-Eluting Cilotax Stent and Everolimus -Eluting Stent Implantation for DE Novo Coronary Artery DisEase in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jan 24, 2012
Registry last updated
Jan 9, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.