Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02115750

Comparison of CHS-0214 to Enbrel (Etanercept) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

This is a two part study comparing CHS-0214 to Enbrel in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response with Methotrexate (MTX) who are naive to biologic therapies.

Pt.1 is a 24-week randomized, double-blind, active-control, parallel-group, multi-center global study. The primary end point is 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR-20) at week 24. Comparing CHS-0214 to Enbrel for efficacy and safety.

Pt. 2 is an open-label single arm study in which patients with at least an ACR-20 response receive CHS-0214. Continued response and safety will be evaluated.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Brest Regional Clinical Hospital, Brest, Belarus

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female adults
  • RA (Rheumatoid Arthritis) diagnosis for 6 months
  • On stable dose of MTX of 8mg to 25mg per week
  • Active disease: greater than 6 tender joints, greater than 6 swollen joints, C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to 0.5mg/dL, and disease activity score (DAS) with 28 joints (DAS28-CRP(4)) greater than or equal to 3.2

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of prednisone greater than 10mg/day
  • Use of greater than one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)
  • Use of biologic therapies for any cause
  • Chemistry and hematology values outside protocol specified range
  • Positive QuantiFERON-tuberculosis (TB) Gold Test
  • Evidence of active lung disease on chest x-ray
  • Major systemic infections
  • Presence of significant comorbid conditions
  • Known allergy to latex
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing

Treatment and study plan

etanercept

Drug

Head-to-head comparison

Other names: Enbrel, European Enbrel

CHS-0214

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. ACR-20 - 20% Improvement According to American College of Rheumatology Criteria

    Time frame: 24-weeks

    The primary efficacy endpoint in Part 1 was the percentage of subjects who achieved ACR20 (20% improvement according to American College of Rheumatology criteria) at week 24 compared to baseline (last non-missing value prior to first dose). Subjects were considered an ACR20 responder if when compared to baseline (last non-missing value prior to first dose), they achieved a 20% decrease in SJC (Swollen joint count), 20% decrease in TJC (Tender joint count), and 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: high sensitivity C reactive protein(hs-CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index(HAQ-DI), subjects global assessment of pain(SPA, VAS), subject's global assessment of disease activity(SGA-VAS), physician's global assessment of disease activity(PGA-VAS)

Secondary outcomes

  1. ACR20 - (20% Improvement According to American College of Rheumatology Criteria) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 18

    Subjects were considered an ACR20 responder if, when compared to baseline (last non-missing value prior to first dose), they achieved a 20% decrease in SJC, 20% decrease in TJC, and 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures:

    • High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP);
    • Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI);
    • Subject's global assessment of pain (ie, subject's pain assessment [SPA]-visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Subject's global assessment of disease activity (SGA-VAS); and
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA-VAS).

    In these calculations, the percent change from baseline to endpoint was used to determine ACR20. For percentage change calculations, results were rounded to 5 decimal places prior to comparing to the threshold of 20%.For SJCs and TJCs, the assessment of efficacy was based on mean change from baseline (last non-missing value prior to first dose evaluation).

  2. Summary of Change in Tender Joint Count (TJC) by Study Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 4,8,12,18,24,28,36,48

    The average percent improvement from baseline in individual ACR response criteria: TJC (Tender joint count) the 66/68 Joint Count evaluates 68 joints for tenderness and pain with movement. The temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), distal interphalangeal (DIP), hip, knee, ankle, tarsus, metatarsophalangeal (MTP), and interphalangeal of the feet are included in this joint count. Hip joints can be evaluated for tenderness.

  3. Summary of Change in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) by Study Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 4,8,12,18,24,28,36,48

    The 66/68 Joint Count evaluates 66 joints for swelling. The temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), distal interphalangeal (DIP), hip, knee, ankle, tarsus, metatarsophalangeal (MTP), and interphalangeal of the feet are included in this joint count.

  4. Summary of Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) by Study Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 4,8,12,18,24,28,36,48

    HAQ-DI - Scales for each question range from 0-3 (0=without any difficulty; 1=with some difficulty; 2=with much difficulty; 3=Unable to do). The "total" for each category is determined by the highest score (greatest difficulty) for that category. The score for the disability index is the mean of the eight category scores. If more than 2 of the categories or 25% are missing, the scale won't be scored. If fewer than 2 or the categories are missing, the sum of the categories was divided by the number of answered categories.

  5. Summary of Change in Subject's Pain Assessment - Visual Analog Scale (SPA-VAS) by Study Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 4,8,12,18,24,28,36,48

    The score range for the SPA-VAS is 0-100 millimeters. One total score was reported for each assessment, no subscales exist. A lower score on the left side represents a better outcome (less pain) and the higher score is on the right side representing a worse outcome (more pain).

  6. Summary of Change in Physician's Global Assessment- Visual Assessment Scale (PGA-VAS) by Study Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 4,8,12,18,24,28,36,48

    The score range for PGA-VAS is 0-100 millimeters. The patient's assessment of disease activity - with the lowest score on the left side representing "none" to the highest score on the right side representing "extremely active".

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Coherus Oncology, Inc.

Industry

Collaborators

  • Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

Registry information

Official study title

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Active-Control Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of CHS-0214 Versus Enbrel in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Treatment With Methotrexate

Acronym: CHS-0214-02

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Apr 16, 2014
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.