Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01760746

Comparison of Changes of Inflammatory Proteins in Aqueous Humour of Subjects Treated With Avastin vs Lucentis

PDR is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss in North America. This disease is caused by the growth of abnormal blood vessels in the retina. These abnormal blood vessels can bleed inside the eye, causing a vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Sometimes when patients have this bleeding, a surgery called vitrectomy is required to remove the blood from within the eye. In order to reduce complications during the surgery, most retina surgeons will inject Avastin into the eye a few days before the surgery.

Avastin (bevacizumab) is currently not approved by Health Canada to treat any ocular disease. Lucentis (ranibizumab) is approved by Health Canada as a treatment for age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal venous occlusive disease. While Avastin is not approved by Health Canada for the treatment of these diseases, the majority of retina specialists around the world are now using Avastin "off-label" to treat these diseases. That is because Avastin and Lucentis both tend to work equally well in these disease, but Avastin is significantly cheaper. While Avastin and Lucentis are generally regarded to be equal, there may be some differences between these two drugs that have not been discovered. The aim of this study is to look for these differences.

Previous research by the investigators in this study has shown that injecting Avastin into eyes causes increased inflammatory proteins to develop inside the eye. This increase in these proteins was related to complications that developed after the vitrectomy surgery. Lucentis may be associated with less of an increase in inflammatory proteins (and less complications). The aim of this study will be to compare Avastin and Lucentis with respect to how they affect inflammatory proteins in the eye, as well as the rate of complications during surgery.

Study participants will be divided into two arms ("groups") of 30 subjects. Subjects will receive Avastin or Lucentis a few days before vitrectomy surgery. The assignment will be random and the study is double-masked. Masking is done so that the investigators can clearly determine any differences between the 2 drugs.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

UBC/VGH Eye Care Centre

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z3N9, Canada

About this study

60 subjects will take part in this study at 2 sites in Canada: Vancouver (Eye Care Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, and Mount Saint Joseph Hospital) and Toronto (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • PDR and vitreous hemorrhage scheduled for vitrectomy surgery and bevacizumab pre-treatment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Vitreous hemorrhage from other causes such as central retinal vein occlusion or ocular ischemic syndrome.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Less than 19 years of age.

Treatment and study plan

Injection of Avastin / Lucentis, sampling aqueous humour

Other

Study participants will be divided into two arms. Subjects will receive Avastin or Lucentis a few days before vitrectomy surgery. The assignment will be double-masked.The first sample of aqueous humor will be obtained immediately prior to the intravitreal injection.

On the same of the intravitreal injection, a blood sample will be taken for hemoglobin A1C measurement. Approximately 1 week later when patients are having their scheduled vitrectomy surgery, an additional sample of aqueous humour will be obtained .

Intraocular cytokines levels will be measured in aqueous humor samples using multiplex cytokine assays.

Other names: Humour, Inflamatory Cytokines, Avastin, Lucentis

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome will be the change in global levels of intraocular inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humour of patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

    Time frame: Baseline and two weeks

    No single inflammatory cytokine or any summary measure of the cytokines has been shown to characterize the effect of anti-VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor)treatment; therefore, we will employ a global test to compare the difference of all inflammatory cytokines between the two treatment groups. For each cytokine the endpoint will be defined as percentage change from baseline. We will employ O'Brien's rank-sum global test to simultaneously evaluate all the inflammatory cytokine endpoints. O'Brien's test is a nonparametric test procedure for testing whether multiple outcomes in one treatment group have consistently larger values than outcomes in the other treatment group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcomes include the change in angiogenic cytokine levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and two weeks

    Study outcomes will be analyzed using multivariate models, and covariates will include age, gender, diabetes type, hemoglobin A1C (glycosilated hemoglobin)level, and the number of days between the time of anti-VEGF pretreatment and vitrectomy.

  2. Secondary outcome measure considers intraoperative complications during vitrectomy.

    Time frame: Baseline and two weeks

    The following intra-operative data will be recorded: use of adjunctive intravitreal/periocular triamcinolone (Kenalog®,)presence of tractional retinal detachment, occurrence of intra-operative bleeding and iatrogenic tears, use of endodiathermy/endolaser, and mean surgical time.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Multi-Centre, Double-Masked, Study to Compare Inflammatory Protein Changes in Aqueous Humour of Subjects Treated With Bevacizumab (Avastin) vs Ranibizumab (Lucentis) Pre-Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Acronym: Humour

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jan 4, 2013
Registry last updated
Apr 16, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.