Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01787825

Comparison of Capso Vision SV-1 to PillCam SB2 in the Evaluation of Subjects With Suspected Small Bowel Disease

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical findings involving the small bowel obtained with the Capso Vision Video Capsule Device to those results obtained with the PillCam SB2.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Pacific Gastroenterology Associates GI Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a prospective, randomized, comparative multi-center site study. The study will be conducted at 5 to 10 clinical sites. Up to 120 subjects will be enrolled in the study in order to obtain complete endoscopic results involving at least 98 subjects.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female between 18 to 85 years of age (inclusive).
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Subjects with suspected small bowel disease who are referred for capsule endoscopy. Suspected small bowel disease includes suspected small bowel bleeding (including obscure gastrointestinal bleed), suspected or established Crohn's Disease [should have had patency capsule, CT or MR enterography before entry], suspected or known celiac disease, suspected small bowel tumor or familial polyposis syndrome.
  • If subject was referred for capsule endoscopy (CE) for identification of occult GI bleeding, has the subject undergone a non-diagnostic esophagoduodenoscopy and colonoscopy as part of their evaluation, OR has the subject had continued bleeding requiring transfusion since the initial evaluation, OR does the subject have the following hematocrit values <31% in males or <28% in females.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects who had a prior negative capsule endoscopy (within 1 year of study).
  • Known or suspected obstruction or stricture unless patency capsule confirms patency.
  • Known or suspected gastrointestinal perforation.
  • Known or suspected small bowel diverticuli.
  • Known swallowing disorder or the inability or unwillingness to swallow pills.
  • Radiation or chemotherapy induced enteritis.
  • History of Zenker's or known duodenal or jejunal diverticula.
  • Isolated diarrhea or isolated abdominal pain without alarm signs or symptoms
  • Subjects who are high risk for undergoing surgical interventions (i.e., to CONFIDENTIAL CapsoVision Protocol SV-1 Revision: October 17, 2011 7 remove the capsule when capsule retention occurs).
  • Subjects with DNR/DNI "do not resuscitate/do not intubate" status.
  • Known or suspected gastrointestinal dysmotility.
  • Presence of cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator or other electromedical implant.
  • History of skin reaction to adhesives.
  • Subjects who in the Investigator's opinion should not consume the 2L GoLytely and 10 mg bisacodyl study drugs, because it could pose a significant additional risk to the subject because of the subject's medical condition.
  • Subjects who are scheduled for an MRI within 30 days of the last study visit.
  • Pregnancy; females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening.
  • Prisoners.
  • Mental and/or physical condition precluding compliance with the study and/or device instructions.
  • Participation in another clinical study within past 30 days.

Treatment and study plan

PillCam SB2 capsule

Device

Capsule Endoscopy system

Other names: capsule endoscopy system

CapsoCam SV-1

Device

Capsule endoscopy

Other names: Capsule endoscopy

Primary outcomes

  1. Normal vs Abnormal, Overall Impression

    Time frame: Study Completion

    The review of images of suspected diseased small bowel to determine agreement among readers between the two image capture systems: CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2. The proportion of Normal vs Abnormal, Overall Impression based upon the result of 2 out of 3 data readers in agreement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of SB Transit Times With CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2

    Time frame: Study Completion

    Total transit time, was determined the time the 1st Duodenal image to the 1st cecal or IC Valve image as determined by the readers.

  2. Comparison of Diagnostic Yield of CapsoCam SV-1 as Compared to PillCam SB2

    Time frame: Study Completion

    Comparison of Diagnostic Yield of CapsoCam SV-1 as compared to PillCam SB: Proportion of primary diagnostic yields based upon the result of 2 out of 3 readers in agreement or the consensus group result.

  3. Preference Between CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2

    Time frame: Study Completion

    Subject preference between CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2 based on pill preference questionnaire administered to subjects

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Capso Vision, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Feb 11, 2013
Registry last updated
May 10, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.