Forward head posture (FHP) is a common condition characterized by abnormal cervical spine, leading to non-specific neck pain (NNP). FHP affects millions of people worldwide, causing pain, reduced productivity and quality of life. Current treatments for NNP associated with FHP include exercise programs and Kinesio taping, but there is limited evidence comparing their effectiveness.
The Brugger relief exercises (BRE) consist of a set of exercises designed to target the cervical spine and adjacent muscles with the goal of enhancing posture, alleviating discomfort, and improving functionality. In contrast, Kinesio taping (KT) is a non-invasive and painless method that involves applying gentle traction to the skin, purportedly leading to the reduction of pain and inflammation. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of BRE versus KT on CVA due to FHP. This research will offer important information on the effectiveness of BRE and KT, guiding healthcare providers and patients in selecting the best treatment for FHP-related NNP. The results will support the creation of evidence-backed protocols for addressing FHP-related NNP, ultimately leading to better treatment results and improved quality of life for those affected