Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02559856

Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban: The Pilot Study

This vanguard pilot study compares rivaroxaban and apixaban, two of the new oral blood thinners for the treatment of blood clots. Half of the patients will receive apixaban and half will receive rivaroxaban. The main objective is to determine the feasibility of patient recruitment and resources required to follow enrolled patients and inform for a larger, multi-centered trial and to assess which one is safer.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Recently developed new oral anticoagulants (OAC) overcome some of the limitations of established therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), due to ease of administration and more predictable pharmacokinetic properties. Many clinical questions about the new OAC remain unanswered because there have not been direct head-to-head comparison trials. For example, although studies have shown that rivaroxaban and apixaban are at least as effective and safe as LMWH and VKA, meta-analyses suggest that apixaban may be associated with lower bleeding risk. Concerns about the potential impact of medication non-adherence have been raised. Compliance with twice daily medications (e.g. apixaban) is often worse than once daily medications (e.g. rivaroxaban). Both of these medications are approved by Health Canada for treatment of VTE yet there is genuine uncertainty about which of the two direct OAC confer the best risk-to-benefit ratio.This is a multi-centre, prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) trial assessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-centered trial comparing bleeding outcomes using apixaban vs. rivaroxaban for treatment of acute VTE. The primary objective of the study is to determine if it is feasible to conduct a large randomized multicenter trial comparing apixaban vs. rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute VTE. The secondary objectives are to assess safety and superiority of apixaban vs rivaroxaban.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed newly diagnosed acute VTE (proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and segmental or greater pulmonary embolism)
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Any contraindication for anticoagulation such as active bleeding
  • Clinically significant liver disease or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels ≥ 3 times the upper limit of normal range
  • Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min calculated with the Cockcroft-Gault formula (29)
  • Known allergies to either apixaban or rivaroxaban
  • Pregnancy
  • Use of contraindicated medications with apixaban or rivaroxaban
  • Active malignancy in the last 6 months (excluding localized skin malignancy)
  • No private insurance coverage for the study drug or not willing to pay for study drug

Treatment and study plan

Apixaban

Drug

Other names: Eliquis

Rivaroxaban

Drug

Other names: Xarelto

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients screened who are eligible to participate in the trial

    Time frame: For the duration of the study 3-6 months

    Assessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-center trial - number of screened patients versus eligible patients

  2. Proportion of eligible patients who consent to participate in the trial

    Time frame: For the duration of the study 3-6 months

    Assessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-center trial - number of eligible patients versus patients who consent to participate

  3. Proportion of patients who attend each follow-up visit

    Time frame: For the duration of the study 3-6 months

    Assessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-center trial - number of patients that miss visits versus patients that attend visits.

  4. Proportion of patients completing all required study procedures, per follow-up visit

    Time frame: For the duration of the study 3-6 months

    Assessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-center trial - number of patients that complete all required procedures/study visits versus patients that do not.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bleeding Events

    Time frame: For the duration of the study 3-6 months

    Major bleeding events, clinically relevant non-major and minor bleeding episodes

  2. Venous Thromboembolism

    Time frame: For the duration of the study 3-6 months

    Recurrent VTE and VTE related-death

  3. Death

    Time frame: For the duration of the study 3-6 months

    • All-cause mortality rates
    • Individual rates of death related to VTE, cardiovascular disease, bleeding or other causes
  4. Medication compliance

    Time frame: For the duration of the study 3-6 months

    As assessed by study pill count

  5. Time-to-event analysis

    Time frame: For the duration of the study 3-6 months

    The time-to-first occurrence of secondary outcomes between randomization and end of follow-up

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Canadian Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research (CanVECTOR) Network

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism: The Pilot Study

Acronym: COBRRA Pilot

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2018
First posted
Sep 24, 2015
Registry last updated
Nov 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.