Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02299011

Comparison of Biomatrix and Orsiro Drug Eluting Stent

The primary objective of the BIODEGRADE study is to evaluate clinical efficacy of the Orsiro drug-eluting stent compared with Biomatrix drug-eluting stent, both of which have biodegradable polymer for the treatment of all-comers' coronary artery diseases.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Seoul National Universtiy Bundang Hospital

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, South Korea

About this study

The rate of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has decreased since the launching of drug-eluting stents (DES). However, restenosis still remains a problem since PCI is being performed on more complex, calcified, tortuous and tough lesions. Furthermore, there is still a controversy on whether these DES are more thrombogenic than bare metal stent (BMS) because of inflammation related to the polymer coating and delayed vessel healing due to the eluted drug despite of reduced restenosis. Therefore, works aiming to reduce both restenosis and thrombotic event are still on-going in the field of interventional cardiology, and there has been a rush of various third generation DES with "biodegradable polymer". Recently, Orsiro hybrid DES (Biotronik AG, Bulach, Switzeland) has been developed. The Orsiro DES incorporated optimally combined two kind of polymer onto thinner cobalt-chromium backbone (60um) compared with earlier type of DES. The BIOlute® active component is a bioabsorbable polymer matrix combined with an anti-proliferative drug, sirolimus, that is released in a controlled manner leaving only the PROBIO® coated stent in the long-term. The PROBIO® passive coating encapsulates the stent and eliminates interaction between the metal stent and the surrounding tissue. To date, Orsiro stent showed excellent results in terms of late lumen loss at 9 months in first-in-man single arm trial comparing the historical results of other DES (BIOFLOW-I trial), and RCT with non-inferiority design, comparing late lumen loss at 9 months of Orsiro versus everolimus-eluting stent (Xience prime®) is ongoing (BIOFLOW-II trial). However, there have been no trials comparing the Orsiro stent versus the Biomatrix stent (Biosensors Inc, Newport Beach, CA, USA).

This multicenter, randomized, open label, parallel arm study will evaluate whether the innovative newer generation stent, Orsiro hybrid DES, is non-inferior to the third generation stent, Biomatrix stent, in terms of 18 months late lumen loss.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • General Inclusion Criteria
  • Subject must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving the Biomatrix flex stents or Orsiro stents, and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.
  • Subject must have significant lesion (>50% by visual estimate) in any of the coronary arteries, venous or arterial bypass grafts.
  • Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable, unstable angina, recent infarction, silent ischemia, positive functional study or a reversible changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia). In subjects with diameter stenosis > 70%, evidence of myocardial ischemia does not have to be documented.
  • Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
  • Target lesion(s) must be located in coronary artery, venous or arterial bypass graft with diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm.
  • Target lesion(s) must be amenable for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Exclusion criteria

  • The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Cilostazol, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Biolimus, Sirolimus, Contrast media (Patients with documented sensitivity to contrast media which can be effectively premedicated with steroids and diphenhydramine [e.g. rash] may be enrolled. Those with true anaphylaxis to prior contrast media, however, should not be enrolled.)
  • Systemic (intravenous) Biolimus or Sirolimus use within 12 months.
  • Female of childbearing potential, unless a recent pregnancy test is negative, who possibly plan to become pregnant any time after enrollment into this study.
  • History of bleeding diathesis, known coagulopathy (including heparin- induced thrombocytopenia), abnormal hemogram (Hb<10g/dL or PLT count <100,000/μL) or will refuse blood transfusions
  • Patients with severe LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF<25%) or cardiogenic shock
  • Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 2 months, or major surgery within 2 months.
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
  • Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow- up period.
  • Symptomatic heart failure

Treatment and study plan

Orsiro drug eluting stent

Device

Orsiro Hybrid drug eluting stent

Other names: Orsiro drug eluting stent (Biotronik AG, Bulach, Switzeland)

Biomatrix drug eluting stent

Drug

Biomatrix Flex drug eluting stent

Other names: Biomatrix drug eluting stent (Biosensors,Newport Beach,USA)

Primary outcomes

  1. Target lesion failure (TLF)

    Time frame: 18 months

    TLF is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

Secondary outcomes

  1. All death

    Time frame: 18 months

    All-cause death as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

  2. All death

    Time frame: 36 months

    All-cause death as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

  3. Cardiac death

    Time frame: 18 months

    cardiac death as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

  4. Cardiac death

    Time frame: 36 months

    cardiac death as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

  5. Target vessel-related MI and all MI

    Time frame: 18 months

    Target vessel-related MI and all MI as measured by percent of participants with adverse events subdivided as q wave and non-q wave

  6. Target vessel-related MI and all MI

    Time frame: 36 months

    Target vessel-related MI and all MI as measured by percent of participants with adverse events subdivided as q wave and non-q wave

  7. Stent thrombosis

    Time frame: 18 months

    Stent thrombosis (definite/possible/probable) as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

  8. Stent thrombosis

    Time frame: 36 months

    Stent thrombosis (definite/possible/probable) as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

  9. Net clinical outcome including bleeding (major and minor) as measured by percent

    Time frame: 18 months

    Net clinical outcome including bleeding (major and minor) as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

  10. Net clinical outcome including bleeding (major and minor) as measured by percent

    Time frame: 36 months

    Net clinical outcome including bleeding (major and minor) as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

  11. In-stent & In-segment late loss

    Time frame: 18 months

    In-stent & In-segment late loss as measure by post-PCI and F/U QCA

  12. In-stent & In-segment late loss

    Time frame: 36 months

    In-stent & In-segment late loss as measure by post-PCI and F/U QCA

  13. In-stent & In-segment % diameter stenosis

    Time frame: 18 months

    In-stent & In-segment % diameter stenosis as measure by post-PCI and F/U QCA

  14. In-stent & In-segment % diameter stenosis

    Time frame: 36 months

    In-stent & In-segment % diameter stenosis as measure by post-PCI and F/U QCA

  15. Degree of stent strut endothelialization and malapposition on OCT

    Time frame: 18 months

    Degree of stent strut endothelialization and malapposition on OCT as measure by post-PCI and F/U OCT analysis

  16. Degree of stent strut endothelialization and malapposition on OCT

    Time frame: 36 months

    Degree of stent strut endothelialization and malapposition on OCT as measure by post-PCI and F/U OCT analysis

  17. Target lesion failure (TLF)

    Time frame: 36 months

    TLF is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization as measured by percent of participants with adverse events

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Chungnam National University Hospital
  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center
  • Gangnam Severance Hospital
  • KangWon National University Hospital
  • Korea University Anam Hospital
  • Korea University Guro Hospital
  • Kosin University Gospel Hospital
  • The Catholic University of Korea
  • Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Biomatrix and Orsiro Drug Eluting Stent in Angiographic Result in Patients With All-comer Patients With Coronary Artery Disease : A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Study (BIODEGRADE Study)

Acronym: BIODEGRADE

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Nov 24, 2014
Registry last updated
Sep 25, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.